Talk: GeneralZELITE
Okay, I understand now. Thanks for the clarification.
Actually, the phrasing could have been better. IAmMaxB (talk) 17:31, June 7, 2016 (UTC)
Regarding Kuat Drive Yards
Greetings. I reverted the edit you made for a couple of reasons. Primarily, you included the Venator-class in the KDY product list, but you didn't provide any source to back it up. Also, the supposed grammatical fix you implemented was, in reality, not a fix at all. "IT'S" serves as a shortened form of either "it is" or "it has", whereas "ITS" signifies possession. In the context of the article, it was referring to "Kuat Drive Yards' allegiance," making "its" the appropriate word. --LelalMekha (talk) 15:54, September 7, 2016 (UTC)
-
It seems that the connection between KDY and the Venator -class can indeed be validated by referencing Ultimate Star Wars . My mistake on that point. However, the "correction" to the grammar was still not correct. -- LelalMekha ( talk ) 16:01, September 7, 2016 (UTC)
-
To begin with, the Venator-class star destroyer's own page explicitly states that Kuat Drive Yards was the manufacturer; if the page lacked a citation, you could have simply included one yourself, rather than removing a perfectly legitimate addition. Furthermore, possessive nouns require an apostrophe, and I am unsure where you acquired your English language skills, but the information you received was obviously not very precise. -- GeneralZELITE ( talk ) 16:19, September 7, 2016 (UTC) I will assume you are joking about both of these points. First, the Venator-class page did not have a source for its KDY association until someone included it just a short while ago, meaning it was unreliable when I undid your edit. As for my command of the English language (or the alleged lack thereof), you are certainly mistaken, and I even suspect you are attempting to troll me. If not, I suggest you consult the Oxford dictionaries and Merriam Webster to understand the difference between "it's" and "its." --LelalMekha (talk) 16:30, September 7, 2016 (UTC) What? I am the one trolling, no. Like i said, it is a widely regarded fact that possessive nouns use apostrophes. Have you actually bothered to read the links I just sent you? Do you even know that "its" is, in fact, not a noun but a possessive pronoun, just like "your", "my" or "their"? Did you even attend English classes at all? --LelalMekha (talk) 16:39, September 7, 2016 (UTC) I actually provided a thorough response to your second comment, correcting both my own statement and yours; however, because you made this unnecessary reply, it was not conveyed, and the information you are currently viewing is not an accurate representation of what I actually said. --GeneralZELITE (talk) 16:56, September 7, 2016 (UTC) This has continued for too long. I concede. Before ending this discussion for good, let me just point out that the first-person pronoun "I" is always capitalized—it is, as you would say, a widely accepted fact. If you intend to instruct me in English, you should first address the issues in your own writing. Farewell! --LelalMekha (talk) 17:03, September 7, 2016 (UTC) I am aware, but I do not feel compelled to give such close attention to a 'debate' occurring on the internet. It is not a grammatical error; it is merely a situation where I cared too little in this instance. As I previously mentioned, we are both incorrect in this matter, but I was the only one prepared to acknowledge it. --GeneralZELITE (talk) 17:08, September 7, 2016 (UTC) Didn't you acknowledge that you were, in fact, correct regarding the Venator-class? I certainly did. And then, you offhandedly suggested that I am unable to speak proper English, even though your supposed correction was incorrect. Enough is enough. As anyone can see in my initial message, I attempted to be educational, but it is simply lost on you. The end of the story. Goodbye! --LelalMekha (talk) 17:13, September 7, 2016 (UTC) No, with regard to your assertion about the general use of apostrophes in possessive nouns. And I never explicitly stated that you were incapable of speaking proper English; that was your own interpretation. I merely implied it might not be precise, and I had already concluded this discussion, but you are continuing it. Anyway, I apologize for my earlier mistake; I simply forgot that 'its' functions similarly to 'hers' or 'theirs,' and so on. --GeneralZELITE (talk) 17:31, September 7, 2016 (UTC) Again, I never stated that possessive nouns do not use apostrophes; I stated that the possessive pronoun "its" does not. If you simply reread my initial two messages, you will see it for yourself. You will not be able to shift the blame onto me. Now, I will not repeat myself: it is finished. Goodbye. --LelalMekha (talk) 17:38, September 7, 2016 (UTC) Oh, okay, my mistake. Sorry, and bye then.
Battle of Sundari
Hello! Adding unverified or speculative information means that what you're adding is either speculation or doesn't include a source, if you add information please make sure its sourced! In this instance you simply need that it comes from the episode 'The Lawless' then that's fine, I hope this is helpful --Lewisr (talk) 16:22, October 2, 2016 (UTC)
- Yes, thank you.