I am wondering something: What specifics are provided by Star Wars: Card Trader concerning Vos's actions during the engagement? --Vos661 (talk) 13:53, April 23, 2016 (UTC)
- This is something I have also been trying to find out. Locating the Card Trader card with the specifics has also proven difficult. It's possible that the article already contains all available information.---- justastarwarsfan13 ( talk ) March 22, 2019
- Quinlan Vos indicates that he was collaborating strategically with the Wookiee Chieftain Tarfful -- Lewisr ( talk ) 18:49, March 22, 2019 (UTC) True. After all, how much detail could a small card actually hold?----justastarwarsfan13 (talk) 3:09 March 22, 2019 Good point; perhaps additional details regarding his involvement will surface eventually --Lewisr (talk) 19:11, March 22, 2019 (UTC) Furthermore, did he make it through Order 66? My understanding is that he's presumed to be living (Darth Vader #7 by Charles Soule), which is a fantastic nod/Easter egg. I doubt Marvel would include that just to mislead fans. Therefore, I'm inclined to believe he survived. The real question is, what became of him? Curious minds want to know! ---- justastarwarsfan13 (talk) 3:33, March 22, 2019 (UTC) I'm confident he survived, and I'm equally certain that these questions will eventually be addressed! We'll simply have to be patient and see when and how they're explored --Lewisr (talk) 19:43, March 22, 2019 (UTC)
On the initial page of Helmet Collection 27, the following was stated: "Initially, the Wookiees attempted to maintain neutrality in the conflict. However, the planet's significance prompted both factions to initiate negotiations with the royal families of Kashyyyk, each seeking to persuade them to join their respective causes. General Grievous, growing impatient with the delay in securing a decision favorable to his interests, ordered preparations for a large-scale assault, believing that this threat would "persuade" the Wookiees to accept the conditions set forth by Count Dooku and his allies. However, this action proved to be a significant miscalculation." My question is whether this passage is considered part of the official Canon? —Unsigned comment by User:RealCarlosV (talk • contribs).
- This can be regarded as canon Editoronthewiki ( talk ) 03:06, 23 October 2021 (UTC)