Thank you for contributing to Wookieepedia! All good-faith contributions to Wookieepedia are appreciated, but we ask that you refer to our Image policy and familiarize yourself with the sourcing and licensing requirements before uploading any more images. The only uploading method supported by Wookieepedia, Special:Upload, will prompt you to enter this information. Thanks! Specifically, File:VaderBeltFunctions.png and File:VaderChestFunctions.png need to use the {{Information}} template and at the very least be properly sourced. OOM 224 08:40, 2 November 2023 (UTC)
Happy to help! Anıl Şerifoğlu (talk) 22:52, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
Hey there! I believe that you will need to move everything that is currently on onto your user page User:Celestial_oubliette which you'll need to make! This is because as you note it contains fanon so per rule 3 of the user page and profile policy 'Fanfiction may only be presented on a user's main user page, not on subpages. Users are encouraged to use the Star Wars Fanon Wiki for longer works.'
Do let me know if you need any help, thank you! Lewisr (talk) 03:29, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
- I didn't say you were making fanon or redlinks, I just said you need to move the info currently on the workbench to User:Celestial_oubliette and then I cited the policy which says that's what you need to do Lewisr (talk) 03:43, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
Hullo! Just offering a quick explanation for why I reverted these contributions of yours here. All material must be in line with Wookieepedia:Sourcing and be cited to a source; this BtS is not. Additionally, your additions make the claim that based on some context within the story it is either referring to the Stenness Node as a whole or the Aweris system by the alternate title "Stennes system"; it is not up to Wookieepeida to speculate or make judgements of that nature. I'm unfamiliar with the source material, but if a "Stennes system" is referred to in the context of someone talking about the Aweris system then that would simply be an alternate name. Thanks, Fan26 () 05:16, 13 November 2023 (UTC)
- Okay cool, just please be careful about speculation and don't be afraid to ask other Wookieepedians for assistance. Thanks! () 05:30, 13 November 2023 (UTC)
You have come close to violating, or have already violated, the Three-Revert Rule. If you continue to edit-war, an administrator will block you from editing. Please reconsider your approach, and pay attention to the advice others provide. Anıl Şerifoğlu (talk) 23:55, 14 November 2023 (UTC)
- You are welcome to disagree with something in an article and voice your opinion on the relevant talk page. It's just that keeping reverting each other's edits while there's an active discussion going on is not a productive approach, and keeping the article as it was before the disagreement makes sense until the issue is resolved. Thank you for your understanding. (talk) 00:27, 15 November 2023 (UTC)
Hey there! I haven't read Fate of the Jedi: Apocalypse myself, but the only reason I have deleted that redirect is that the discussion on the talk pages of both subjects suggested that most editors did not agree with separating it into two articles. As far as I can see, the article doesn't actually say that Celestials=Architects either, but establishes that the two of the Celestials were also referred to as the Architects. I'm personally leaning towards documenting them in the same article as the Architects don't seem to be a separate body but only an alternate name for these two ancient entities, but please feel free to start a discussion on the talk page if you believe the two terms should be documented on separate pages. Anıl Şerifoğlu (talk) 02:22, 17 November 2023 (UTC)
It's not just Insmot Bowen that calls Celestials the Architects, but The Essential Atlas and other reference books. Also Killiks were established as less reliable in the same book Killik on Wookieepedia --Goodmind (talk) 04:01, 17 November 2023 (UTC)
--Goodmind (talk) 04:15, 17 November 2023 (UTC)
No, it's omniscient narrator. It says they are believed to be responsible for building stellar objects which are later confirmed in other sources, not that they're not called Architects. --Goodmind (talk) 04:24, 17 November 2023 (UTC)
If you're convinced Killiks aren't wrong, I think it's fine to describe their version on the Ones page. How many sources say Architects are not Celestials versus the ones (no pun) that do? --Goodmind (talk) 05:13, 17 November 2023 (UTC)
- Hi, I've checked out all the sources listed in the articles in question today, and while initial sources treat the connection between the Celestials and Architects as theorized/claimed to be the same, later sources such as The Essential Atlas and SW.com outright say that they were also "called the Architects" and "Celestial architects." Previous sources' ambiguity doesn't necessarily contradict what the TEA and SW.com say as a fact, and a major overhaul to Celestial-related articles suggesting they were only "allegedly" the same group requires at least a discussion first. (talk) 13:06, 17 November 2023 (UTC)