Thank you for contributing to Wookieepedia! Please note that at least one of your recent additions added unverified information to a mainspace article. Additions to Wookieepedia's articles must be verifiable by a reliable source per our sourcing policy, and unverified information may be reverted or deleted. If you would like some help learning how to properly source additions, you can see this tutorial or ask for assistance in our Discord server. Thanks! --DarthRuiz30 (talk) 23:51, 20 May 2022 (UTC)
- Do not add speculation to any article. Just state what they did, not what they possibly were doing. --DarthRuiz30 (talk) 00:23, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
Yeah, I can see how its hard to approve that Zakuul Knights would join the Alliance, but don't forget that at least a sub-group had been loyal to Senya instead of Valkorion, so I can see a group of them understanding what the Alliance was doing and join them. Also let's not forget that the Eternal Alliance took control of Zakuul's government and military which makes the Knights probably be inclined to join them. That's why they were branded as traitors/deserters, because technically the Alliance was the one holding the power over the planet. As the letter from Consul Axion mentions, Zakuul didn't seek independece from the Alliance until they lost the Eternal Fleet and the Gravestone, so they probably were skeptical of leaving such a powerful ally.
Also, don't forget to sign every comment using ~~~~. Thanks--DarthRuiz30 (talk) 04:45, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
- Well it depends a lot if the Commander established a peaceful alliance or proceeded with the Dark side option and established an Empire. Depending on the choice I would imagine the public would react differently. Regardless, these questions will probably never get answers. Besides the small cutscene after taking the Eternal throne, there wasn't much about the public and military reaction to the Eternal Alliance taking power over Zakuul, and I doubt we see Zakuul again in the near future. --DarthRuiz30 (talk) 05:32, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
Hi. You edit was reverted because it created a version of the article that was conflicting with our Layout Guide, as no articles should be left without an introduction. Furthermore, the modification introduced a sourcing problem, as one of the new paragraphs created wasn't supported by a reference. Finally, the quote should be referenced by our new standard (meaning: classical referencing), with a reference supported by {{TORcite}}. My best advice would be to get used to smaller edits, and to familiarize with our policies, especially by looking at our status articles. And don't forget to sign your "talk" messages using ~~~~. NanoLuuke 22:50, 31 May 2022 (UTC)
Hi. First, I'm going to stress this, but you really need to sign your messages (like when you leave a message on my talk page), as instructed by Ruiz and myself. Failure to comply may lead to a temporary block, as it's an essential aspect of our message system and properly attribute who's talking (and when). Second, we have guide on referencing on our Sourcing policy, but you can also consult our tutorial. I understand that {{TORcite}} can be a little bit harder to grasp, and you should really have a look at the template documentation. Finally, I am not entirely sure to understand the meaning with you other question... but if you want to see how your change affect a page before to save an edit, the preview button (next to "save changes") is what you want. Also, accessing a page history (available on the drop-down meny next to "EDIT" button on every page), can help you see what has been changed on a page. NanoLuuke 08:12, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
Okay, for the Scions of Zakuul, you'll need to make it comply with the Layout Guide. As the LG says, the introduction should be a summary of the contents of the body, yet right now a bulk of the information is in the introduction. Furthermore, per the LG, the subject of the article should be bolded upon its first mention in the introduction, yet you have moved the bolded name to the History section. There is also substantial grammatical errors and unclear citation in the article, so we would appreciate if you could put the effort into cleaning them up. I have reverted your edits for now, but you may reinstate your changes if you make sure to have them comply with the Layout Guide and other Wookieepedia policies. You can access the article history using this link. OOM 224 17:05, 14 June 2022 (UTC)
- Hi. I've reverted you once again because of several problems still persisting, including the presence of a quote between paragraph and the presence of referencing in the introduction. Again, the introduction is a resume of the rest of the article, and should never contain exclusive information (that can't be found elsewhere in the article), and thus isn't subjected to referencing. Please refer to the [[Wookieepedia: Manual of Style to better grasp our rules regarding sourcing and quotes. NanoLuuke 14:06, 25 June 2022 (UTC)