Talk: GenralHux

Hey, no problem I'm always happy to help out when I can! Wow yes that would be totally awesome if you can get the article upto FA status and I hope you can achieve it, if you need any help or anything then feel free to ask --Lewisr (talk) 22:15, October 26, 2017 (UTC)

Hello, sorry if there was any confusion, I removed the tweet as a source as Forum:CT:Social media posts as canon sources was recently passed, meaning we can't use tweets as sources anymore in most cases.--Vitus Infinitus 13:41, January 23, 2018 (UTC)

Hey! As I noted on the nom page it's not really possible to convert it into a GAN. But I'm able to have the nom taken down via on discord. Thank you! Lewisr (talk) 14:08, 19 September 2023 (UTC)

• You're welcome! And as I said hopefully you can get it back up at one point, just after you get a GA under your belt Lewisr (talk) 14:18, 19 September 2023 (UTC)

Hey! I haven't yet, but I am still looking at the page. It hasn't been forgotten don't worry! Though I do want to note that it's generally frowned upon to ask these kind of questions to reviewers/potential reviewers. Though since you're relatively new to the whole process don't worry, just something to keep in mind for the future Lewisr (talk) 18:27, 8 October 2023 (UTC)

• I understand there was no harm intended, it's fine! Though sometimes that's just the nature, we want these pages to be the best they can, so sometimes it may take a bit of time, especially when there are so a lot of other pages to be going through also Lewisr (talk) 15:58, 9 October 2023 (UTC)

Hey there! Just to let you know, you have an objection from Uber that is 10 days unaddressed as of today, if you would take a look at it when you get a chance please. Thank you! Lewisr (talk) 22:53, 20 December 2023 (UTC)

• I don't think we disallow them to be made, if someone wanted to make the page for a sentient species they'd be welcome to. Regarding the objection itself, we (as in the AC board for the good article nominations) are aware of the objection from Uber and we do agree with it, and that's why no one has intervened, so we do need you to make it (you don't have to fully write it up, it can be made as a stub or something), or we'd have no choice but to consider it a timed out objection. Given all the work done to the page, would be a shame to see the nom come down, so would appreciate if you'd make the link Lewisr (talk) 17:34, 21 December 2023 (UTC)
• Hey there! Just leaving a heads up if you would be able to address the discussed changes as soon as possible please Lewisr (talk) 20:00, 26 December 2023 (UTC)