No worries. If you look at the infobox code, all type of character infobox have master and apprentice fields, not just Jedi and Sith. As long as there is a teacher/student relationship on some subject the field can be used. - Sir Cavalier of One 17:01, June 8, 2016 (UTC)
Hello. Message received. The Abuse Filter you triggered was most likely created as an anti-spam measure. You should be able to get around it by simply putting the URL in brackets so that it becomes an actual link. For example, like this. If that doesn't work for you, let me know. And thanks for the 100,000 congrats. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 05:11, October 20, 2017 (UTC)
Thank you so much for your kind words, it really means a lot to me! I'm glad to help you where I can, I hope your questions about Wilco are resolved, if not then feel free to ask further and I'll try to help Lewisr (talk) 02:31, 11 March 2023 (UTC)
Hi Red Heathen. I'll be honest, I'm not sure how we treat new subjects that were introduced in a FFG Sourcebook that we label as BOTH. If I remember correctly, we would need both a Legends and Canon article for Bellows, but I'm not 100% sure anymore. I would contact Ayrehead as he was the main admin in charge of creating our FFG policy. I hope this answer helps you.--DarthRuiz30 (talk) 02:39, 26 April 2023 (UTC)
Hi, please remember that-as stated in talk page header templates-article talk pages are to be "used for discussion relating to changes to the article, not for a discussion about the topic in question." On Talk: Emerie Karr you asked a general question about lore which would be more suitable on the Discussions Forum, not a question about altering the content of the article itself. Fan26 () 01:13, 6 May 2023 (UTC)
No it's okay, don't worry, don't be so hard on yourself! It's better to ask than not be sure. I totally get it! It's not a waste of time at all if it results in it helping out! Lewisr (talk) 02:02, 8 June 2023 (UTC)
No worries. If you look at the infobox code, all type of character infobox have master and apprentice fields, not just Jedi and Sith. As long as there is a teacher/student relationship on some subject the field can be used. - Sir Cavalier of One 17:01, June 8, 2016 (UTC)
- Go to the article's talk page--DarthRuiz30 (talk) 02:40, October 17, 2017 (UTC)
Hello. Message received. The Abuse Filter you triggered was most likely created as an anti-spam measure. You should be able to get around it by simply putting the URL in brackets so that it becomes an actual link. For example, like this. If that doesn't work for you, let me know. And thanks for the 100,000 congrats. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 05:11, October 20, 2017 (UTC)
- Thanks for the info. :) I did that, but the abuse log wasn't updated. I suppose it doesn't get updated, but at least now I know how to handle internal links for future use. Red Heathen () 21:33, November 3, 2017 (UTC)
Hi Red Heathen. I'll be honest, I'm not sure how we treat new subjects that were introduced in a FFG Sourcebook that we label as BOTH. If I remember correctly, we would need both a Legends and Canon article for Bellows, but I'm not 100% sure anymore. I would contact Ayrehead as he was the main admin in charge of creating our FFG policy. I hope this answer helps you.--DarthRuiz30 (talk) 02:39, 26 April 2023 (UTC)
Hi, please remember that-as stated in talk page header templates-article talk pages are to be "used for discussion relating to changes to the article, not for a discussion about the topic in question." On Talk: Emerie Karr you asked a general question about lore which would be more suitable on the Discussions Forum, not a question about altering the content of the article itself. Fan26 () 01:13, 6 May 2023 (UTC)
- I left a reply for you on your Talk page. Hope you can help. Red Heathen () 00:13, 14 May 2023 (UTC)