Hey there. Please see the last paragraph of Swan's "Behind the scenes" section. Ma'kis'shaalas's Behind the scenes section also has a good explanation. Leland also lists Labyrinth of Evil as taking place at 18 BBY in his blog, and The Unifying Force at 28 ABY. Like the date he gives for the Conclave on Kessel, they're mistakes. Cheers. Menkooroo 18:40, January 8, 2012 (UTC)
Feel free, just make sure to replace one of the old ones. And crap, sorry, I just realized I didn't reply to your other message. I used to have an image of that Geonosis Jedi uploaded to my age-old angelfire account, but I can't seem to access it anymore. The best I could do would be a low-quality screenshot from the film. I can grab one within the next couple of days if you'd like. Menkooroo 03:39, January 23, 2012 (UTC)
Hey there! Please don't remove redlinks from articles, as you did here. Redlinks should be filled in, not removed. Cheers. Menkooroo 20:17, January 24, 2012 (UTC)
Since we only do this when there's only an amount of {{Nc}} appearances, it is not necessary to give a non canon appearance its own section if there's only a few in the appearance section. Hope this helps, JangFett 15:50, February 11, 2012 (UTC)
Have you copied my things from my killcount list? --Station7 16:02, March 8, 2012 (UTC)
I understand that you copied, and I accept your apology, but it's not nice, to see other people copy things that I did, while I put there a lot of time. I spend weeks to make it better and new information, and then to see this, is a bit dissappointent. --Station7 16:07, March 8, 2012 (UTC)
I reverted your edit because your change is more complex than simply changing the template to {{Flash}}. The Hurst article is one of Wookieepedia's Good articles, meaning that it needs to adhere to all of our site's policies found in the Manual of Style and Layout Guide to retain its status. One of the requirements of the Layout Guide is that for items in an article's Appearances and Sources sections, the article must specify the subject's "first appearance" and/or "first mention." One of the results of your edit is that the article is no longer specifying the subject's first mention because you replaced the {{1stm}} tag with the {{Flash}} tag. I cannot verify myself whether Path of Destruction is a "mention only" or a "flashback" appearance in regard to Hurst, so I took the safe route and simply reverted to the article's original version. If PoD is indeed a flashback appearance, then it requires the {{1st}} template and would look like this: . Toprawa and Ralltiir 05:31, April 26, 2012 (UTC)
Hello. I'm wondering where in the novel (what chapters) you found all these characters you put into appearance section. I know I read this novel back on 2008 and add a lot of missing appearances while I progress thru. You know they needs to be mentioned by name in the novel if you add - (Mentioned only) - taggs to them. Otherwise if they're only hinted like f.e. someone's father, mother, sister, brother, we got - (Indirect mention only) - tag for that purpose.--Jedi Marty (talk) 22:00, June 29, 2012 (UTC)
To be honest, I'm not sure we can assume that it's a Jedi training cruiser, much less the Crucible. I realize that it was destroyed on Florrum, but I'm not seeing much resemblance between the wreckage in "Revival" and the actual ship. Also, we would need official confirmation to say that the remains of the Crucible were brought to Ohnaka's pirate base, since it's not very clear from "Revival" or "A Necessary Bond." CC7567 22:51, December 1, 2012 (UTC)
Hi there! I just saw your "Canon" page, and it really excited me. I would like to ask, where did you get the information that Savage Opress, Pre Vizsla, and those others will die? Or is it just... speculation? Greetings, --XXLVenom998 (talk) 12:57, December 29, 2012 (UTC)
Hey, I wanna wish you a happy new year! :) --XXLVenom998 (talk) 10:52, December 31, 2012 (UTC)
Apologies about that, it missed my eyes entirely. Please make sure next time, though, to reload the new infobox, since there were some dangling fields left from the {{Dathomiri character infobox}}, which has some different parameters. Again, sorry about the confusion. CC7567 21:59, February 23, 2013 (UTC)
Greetings. I noticed you have Star Wars: The Clone Wars: The Complete Season Four in your collection. May I ask if you own the DVD or the BlueRay-Version? I would need the information about Bulduga in the latter one to update him. Thanks for your time. Clone Commander Lee 10:55, March 30, 2013 (UTC)
Hello, and thanks for reaching out to me. Neither your account nor your user subpages have been "locked" in any way, the latter have just been redirected into your base user page. All you need to do to restore them is: 1) go to the edit history of the page you want to recover, and 2) undo the edit in which they were redirected to your user page. Hope this helps, Imperators II 10:50, January 24, 2020 (UTC)
Is it possible for you to fix the redirect listed in the title which you used in your sandbox please? Braha'tok enthusiast 15:05, August 27, 2020 (UTC)
Is it possible for you to fix the redirect listed in User:Ressor/Canon Timeline, please? Mr Star Wars AminoRepublic (talk) 19:23, December 6, 2020 (UTC)
Hey there. Please see the last paragraph of Swan's "Behind the scenes" section. Ma'kis'shaalas's Behind the scenes section also has a good explanation. Leland also lists Labyrinth of Evil as taking place at 18 BBY in his blog, and The Unifying Force at 28 ABY. Like the date he gives for the Conclave on Kessel, they're mistakes. Cheers. Menkooroo 18:40, January 8, 2012 (UTC)
- No need to apologize; you were editing based on a statement by Chee, which is usually correct. :P As far as I know, Dark Lord is in 19 BBY. The opening of the novel is set during the events of Revenge of the Sith, and the rest of the novel over the following couple of weeks. A scene from Star Wars: Dark Times: The Path to Nowhere is taken right out of Dark Lord, and The Path to Nowhere is dated at 19 BBY. If Chee dates Dark Lord at 18 BBY in his blog entry, I'd say it's another mistake. The guy really needs to do more research! :D Menkooroo 20:18, January 8, 2012 (UTC)
Feel free, just make sure to replace one of the old ones. And crap, sorry, I just realized I didn't reply to your other message. I used to have an image of that Geonosis Jedi uploaded to my age-old angelfire account, but I can't seem to access it anymore. The best I could do would be a low-quality screenshot from the film. I can grab one within the next couple of days if you'd like. Menkooroo 03:39, January 23, 2012 (UTC)
Hey there! Please don't remove redlinks from articles, as you did here. Redlinks should be filled in, not removed. Cheers. Menkooroo 20:17, January 24, 2012 (UTC)
- "Appearances" sections should be complete, and should include every character that appears in the work, regardless of the size of their role or whether they've been in anything else or not. We have hundreds of articles on unidentified characters, and they're valid characters like anyone else. Definitely keep that in mind. Menkooroo 21:01, January 24, 2012 (UTC)
Since we only do this when there's only an amount of {{Nc}} appearances, it is not necessary to give a non canon appearance its own section if there's only a few in the appearance section. Hope this helps, JangFett 15:50, February 11, 2012 (UTC)
- Also, we use "non-canon" for the section title. JangFett 15:51, February 11, 2012 (UTC)
Have you copied my things from my killcount list? --Station7 16:02, March 8, 2012 (UTC)
I understand that you copied, and I accept your apology, but it's not nice, to see other people copy things that I did, while I put there a lot of time. I spend weeks to make it better and new information, and then to see this, is a bit dissappointent. --Station7 16:07, March 8, 2012 (UTC)
I reverted your edit because your change is more complex than simply changing the template to {{Flash}}. The Hurst article is one of Wookieepedia's Good articles, meaning that it needs to adhere to all of our site's policies found in the Manual of Style and Layout Guide to retain its status. One of the requirements of the Layout Guide is that for items in an article's Appearances and Sources sections, the article must specify the subject's "first appearance" and/or "first mention." One of the results of your edit is that the article is no longer specifying the subject's first mention because you replaced the {{1stm}} tag with the {{Flash}} tag. I cannot verify myself whether Path of Destruction is a "mention only" or a "flashback" appearance in regard to Hurst, so I took the safe route and simply reverted to the article's original version. If PoD is indeed a flashback appearance, then it requires the {{1st}} template and would look like this: . Toprawa and Ralltiir 05:31, April 26, 2012 (UTC)
- Looks good. Thanks. Toprawa and Ralltiir 17:14, April 26, 2012 (UTC)
Hello. I'm wondering where in the novel (what chapters) you found all these characters you put into appearance section. I know I read this novel back on 2008 and add a lot of missing appearances while I progress thru. You know they needs to be mentioned by name in the novel if you add - (Mentioned only) - taggs to them. Otherwise if they're only hinted like f.e. someone's father, mother, sister, brother, we got - (Indirect mention only) - tag for that purpose.--Jedi Marty (talk) 22:00, June 29, 2012 (UTC)
- I understand. When I'm reading I'm not making notes of pages of character appearances either. Ok, I'm interested almost about all characters you added. Namely: Ur-Sema Du, Sha'a Gi, both Naberries sisters and your latest addition Lushros Dofine. I don't know how far you are at reading this novel, but can you at least point me to the chapters, where these characters are mentioned? Thanks.--Jedi Marty (talk) 10:44, June 30, 2012 (UTC)
To be honest, I'm not sure we can assume that it's a Jedi training cruiser, much less the Crucible. I realize that it was destroyed on Florrum, but I'm not seeing much resemblance between the wreckage in "Revival" and the actual ship. Also, we would need official confirmation to say that the remains of the Crucible were brought to Ohnaka's pirate base, since it's not very clear from "Revival" or "A Necessary Bond." CC7567 22:51, December 1, 2012 (UTC)
Hi there! I just saw your "Canon" page, and it really excited me. I would like to ask, where did you get the information that Savage Opress, Pre Vizsla, and those others will die? Or is it just... speculation? Greetings, --XXLVenom998 (talk) 12:57, December 29, 2012 (UTC)
- Oh... I thought that book wasn't released yet. Anyways, thats really sad, they were some of my favourite characters. However, it is exciting that Maul will survive. Thanks for the information. Cheers, --XXLVenom998 (talk) 13:29, December 29, 2012 (UTC)
Hey, I wanna wish you a happy new year! :) --XXLVenom998 (talk) 10:52, December 31, 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks! --XXLVenom998 (talk) 11:02, December 31, 2012 (UTC)
Apologies about that, it missed my eyes entirely. Please make sure next time, though, to reload the new infobox, since there were some dangling fields left from the {{Dathomiri character infobox}}, which has some different parameters. Again, sorry about the confusion. CC7567 21:59, February 23, 2013 (UTC)
Greetings. I noticed you have Star Wars: The Clone Wars: The Complete Season Four in your collection. May I ask if you own the DVD or the BlueRay-Version? I would need the information about Bulduga in the latter one to update him. Thanks for your time. Clone Commander Lee 10:55, March 30, 2013 (UTC)
Hello, and thanks for reaching out to me. Neither your account nor your user subpages have been "locked" in any way, the latter have just been redirected into your base user page. All you need to do to restore them is: 1) go to the edit history of the page you want to recover, and 2) undo the edit in which they were redirected to your user page. Hope this helps, Imperators II 10:50, January 24, 2020 (UTC)
Is it possible for you to fix the redirect listed in the title which you used in your sandbox please? Braha'tok enthusiast 15:05, August 27, 2020 (UTC)