Talk: Protectorate

Re:Otto

Greetings, Protectorate. I appreciate your kind words. If you are able to produce Demolition screenshots, that could be quite beneficial--not only for Otto's page, but also for upcoming updates. However, the reason we intentionally avoided using an image from either the victory or defeat cinematic is because doing so would involve speculation. Since no official sources have confirmed whether he emerged victorious, we cannot make that determination ourselves. Ideally, the best image for Otto's infobox would be the profile picture of him that once appeared on the Demolition minisite—similar to these examples—but unfortunately, that website is no longer accessible. --LelalMekha (discussion) 14:32, November 12, 2013 (UTC)

You are indeed correct in stating that the infobox image should reflect the most recent known appearance. While that is generally the standard practice, there are situations where it is simply not feasible. :-) Also, if I may offer another suggestion: it is generally considered good practice to consult with the primary maintainer of a status article (either Good or Featured Article) before making modifications. This isn't a formal policy or rule, but rather a customary courtesy we extend to one another. I personally don't object to people making constructive edits to my GAs and FAs, as you have done, but others may be more sensitive about such changes than I am. ;-) -- LelalMekha ( discussion ) 15:16, November 12, 2013 (UTC) Rest assured, I am not bothered in the slightest, as I mentioned before. However, you can never predict how others might react. Furthermore, someone needs to inform you about these unspoken conventions—otherwise, how would you ever learn about them? ;-) --LelalMekha (talk) 15:51, November 12, 2013 (UTC)

Smokin' barns

Hello, Protectorate,

It's fantastic to hear of your interest in organizing a barn-raising event! The most effective way to assess community interest is to initiate a discussion thread in the Senate Hall to inquire about potential participants and to share thematic ideas. We've previously considered doing NJO Jedi; it was a leading contender for the theme of the inaugural event. Menkooroo (discussion) 00:49, December 6, 2013 (UTC)

Agreeing with Menkooroo, it has been quite some time since our last event, so I am confident that users will support the endeavor and contribute valuable ideas. 501st dogma (talk) 01:05, December 6, 2013 (UTC)

Gand

As I indicated on the Gand review page, there remains additional information from The Long Arm of the Hutt that needs to be incorporated into the Gand article. The update is not yet complete.--Exiled Jedi (Greetings) 06:07, January 8, 2014 (UTC)

No worries; I simply wanted to bring it to your attention.-- Exiled Jedi (Greetings) 06:15, January 8, 2014 (UTC)

Wookieepedian of the Month

Greetings Protectorate, my congratulations on your selection as February's Wookieepedian of the Month! 1358 (Talk) 12:05, February 1, 2014 (UTC)

Congratulations! 501st dogma (talk) 12:42, February 1, 2014 (UTC)
My congratulations to you. Supreme Emperor ( discussion ) 14:25, February 1, 2014 (UTC)

Interview

Hey Protectorate. You may or may not be aware that we used to conduct interviews with the Wookieepedian of the Month each month. However, this practice was discontinued midway through last year due to time constraints and other life factors. I am planning to revive the tradition and was wondering if you would be interested in participating in an interview. Thank you, and once again, congratulations on being WOTM. Supreme Emperor (discussion) 03:01, February 7, 2014 (UTC)