Don't be concerned. When you examine the infobox's structure, you'll see that every character infobox includes fields for both master and apprentice, not exclusively Jedi and Sith. These fields are appropriate whenever a mentor/student relationship exists regarding a particular topic. - Sir Cavalier of One(Squadron channel) 17:01, June 8, 2016 (UTC)
- Navigate to the discussion page for that article-- DarthRuiz30 ( talk ) 02:40, October 17, 2017 (UTC) You'll have to post it on the talk page and then wait for a consensus to form before you can proceed. Until a consensus is reached, you are not permitted to rename it just because it's cumbersome. Best of luck with this. --DarthRuiz30 (talk) 05:54, October 17, 2017 (UTC) Alright, DR, I understand. Perhaps a name alteration will be possible due to the core issue: Publication Dates and their order of precedence. Thanks again. Red Heathen (talk) 06:17, October 17, 2017 (UTC) Apparently, we are constrained to using only Galactic Basic names, specifically for Twi'leks: [[1]] I've just learned that an Admin will handle the page move when they have the opportunity. Red Heathen (talk) 07:59, October 17, 2017 (UTC)
Greetings. Your message has been received. The Abuse Filter that was triggered was most likely implemented as a spam deterrent. You should be able to circumvent it by simply enclosing the URL within brackets, thus transforming it into a functional link. For instance, like so. If you are still experiencing difficulties, please inform me. Also, thank you for the congratulations on reaching 100,000 edits. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 05:11, October 20, 2017 (UTC)
- I appreciate the information. :) I did attempt that, but the abuse log remained unchanged. I presume that it doesn't update, but at least I now understand how to manage internal links moving forward. Red Heathen ( talk ) 21:33, November 3, 2017 (UTC)
I'm very grateful for your kind words; they are truly meaningful to me! I am happy to assist you in any way I can. I trust that your inquiries regarding Wilco have been addressed. If not, please don't hesitate to ask further questions, and I will do my best to help. Lewisr (talk) 02:31, 11 March 2023 (UTC)
Hello Red Heathen. To be frank, I am uncertain about how we handle newly introduced subjects in an FFG Sourcebook that we classify as BOTH. If my memory serves me correctly, we would require both a Legends article and a Canon article for Bellows, but I no longer possess complete certainty. I suggest reaching out to Ayrehead, as they were the primary administrator responsible for establishing our FFG policy. I hope this response is helpful to you.--DarthRuiz30 (talk) 02:39, 26 April 2023 (UTC)
Please bear in mind that, as indicated in the talk page header templates, article talk pages are meant to be "used for discussion relating to changes to the article, not for a discussion about the topic in question." On Talk: Emerie Karr you posed a general question about lore, which would be more appropriately addressed in the Discussions Forum, rather than a question regarding modifications to the article's content. Fan26 (Talk) 01:13, 6 May 2023 (UTC)
- I have posted a response for you on your Talk page. I hope you are able to assist me. Red Heathen ( talk ) 00:13, 14 May 2023 (UTC)
That's perfectly fine, there's no need to worry, and don't be so critical of yourself! It's always preferable to inquire rather than remain uncertain. I completely understand your perspective! It's certainly not a waste of time if it ultimately proves beneficial! Lewisr (talk) 02:02, 8 June 2023 (UTC)