My archives:
Wokiepedian
I'm heeerrre!!! O_o Now why did you call me here? --Justin W. (talk) 13:35, March 6, 2014 (UTC)
We do have a IRC channel which anyone is welcome to join. Hope that helps. Supreme Emperor (talk) 04:10, March 25, 2014 (UTC)
We generally don't do that. If it doesn't have an article, we don't link it. IFYLOFD 03:33, March 29, 2014 (UTC)
Hey, just a friendly heads up, I reverted your edit here because we generally avoid linking within quotes. Happy editing :) Supreme Emperor (talk) 03:45, March 29, 2014 (UTC)
- Not at all :) Everyone makes mistakes :) Supreme Emperor (talk) 03:50, March 29, 2014 (UTC)
Your best bet would probably be to read through some of our policies, which are linked to in the welcome template included above this message. This would let you get a better feel for how we do things here :) Supreme Emperor (talk) 04:27, March 29, 2014 (UTC)
Just wanted to let you know, I reverted your edit to the CWA article because overall, the grammar was poor and somewhat confusing. I would recommend trying out our sandbox, linked here, to make a few practice edits. :) Happy editing, Supreme Emperor (talk) 13:53, March 29, 2014 (UTC)
Yeah, just give me a heads up when your done with it and I can take a look at it :) Also, somethings wrong with your signature. It's not linking to your userpage. Supreme Emperor (talk) 15:35, March 29, 2014 (UTC)
If you have any questions, i'd be happy to help :) I'm going to be heading out shortly, so i'll try to take a look at it later tonight :) Supreme Emperor (talk) 15:39, March 29, 2014 (UTC)
Unfortunately, your current signature violates our signature policy. Background colors are prohibited. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask. JangFett 20:04, March 29, 2014 (UTC)
- You'll need to remove your signature's background color. JangFett 20:06, March 29, 2014 (UTC)
Hey Emperor, please be careful when you're submitting edits. If you take a look at your edits here, you'll see multiple grammatical and linking mistakes. I took care of the issues, but please be careful in the future. Take a look at some of our policies before editing. Thanks, JangFett 19:49, April 2, 2014 (UTC)
Uh... sure. IFYLOFD 02:45, April 3, 2014 (UTC)
- No, those are fine as-is. 02:53, April 3, 2014 (UTC)
I have given you a chance to bring your signature in line with the signature policy, but instead of bringing it into compliance, you have instead chosen to ignore one off the issues I have pointed out and also introduce a new violation. Therefore I am giving you a final warning. The remaining violations are as follows:
I am going to give you 24 hours to resolve these issues and modify your signature to bring it into full compliance with the signature policy. If I see even one signature from you after that 24-hour grace period that is not in full and complete compliance with all aspects of the signature policy, further enforcement steps will be taken, which may include, but are not limited to, deletion of your signature template and/or a complete block from editing.
src means source. If you click on the src button, it will link you to where the source came from. For example, if you click the src button in the quote on Valoy's page, it will take you to Star Wars: The Old Republic, because his quote came from the game. Hope that helps :) Supreme Emperor (talk) 14:25, April 3, 2014 (UTC)
Congratulations. Just make sure to always double check your work with the preview button :) Supreme Emperor (talk) 14:30, April 3, 2014 (UTC)
- Clicking preview doesn't change anything, it just shows you what your edit will look like without actually saving it. It's a good way to double check additions. Supreme Emperor (talk) 15:42, April 3, 2014 (UTC)
Copy editing is a term used mainly while reviewing articles. I use it when I'm reviewing an article up for nomination and find a small error or something that needs to be tweaked. Essentially it means I'm fixing an error while reviewing the article. Hope that helps :) Supreme Emperor (talk) 04:17, April 4, 2014 (UTC)
It'd be really tough. Lot of sources, big article. I guess it's possible, but it would be a big undertaking. IFYLOFD 03:27, April 7, 2014 (UTC)
- By "undertaking", I mean it would be a big commitment. And sure, we can talk later. 03:33, April 7, 2014 (UTC)
I'm a little busy atm, Emperor. JangFett 00:21, April 8, 2014 (UTC)
Yes, certainly. The P&T needs expansion and then splitting, and the quote would be perfect for it. Clone Commander Lee 11:14, April 8, 2014 (UTC)
Disambiguation pages can be created by anyone. For example, with the Battle of Bilbringi disambig page begins with a brief description of the disambig, followed by a list of battles taking place on Bilbringi, then the {{Disambig}}, followed by categories. Hope this helps :) Supreme Emperor (talk) 13:55, April 8, 2014 (UTC)
- What did you want to create a disambig page for? Supreme Emperor (talk) 14:13, April 8, 2014 (UTC)
Best bet would be to go through each source and appearance, and make sure all information relevant to Hawkeye is in the article. Supreme Emperor (talk) 15:53, April 8, 2014 (UTC)
- Just a heads up when referencing TCW episodes you want to use the actual episode name in the reference. DarthRevan1173 (Long live Lord Revan) 02:55, April 9, 2014 (UTC)
The trash compactor is for articles nominated for deletion go. For example, is currently nominated for deletion. The TC page created for that article, found here, has options for keep and delete. Users then vote on whether the article should be kept or deleted. Sometimes, there are additional options, such as redirect, or moving the page to a new title. Hope this helps :) Supreme Emperor (talk) 13:55, April 9, 2014 (UTC)
- Articles that are clearly vandalism, fanon, or general nonsense can be immediately tagged for deletion. Supreme Emperor (talk) 14:18, April 9, 2014 (UTC)
Well, from a quick glance the entire infobox could do with sourcing. There are also several redirects in the article. If you go to your preferences, and then the gadgets tab, there is an option "Highlight all redirects orange." Click it and all redirects throughout the Wook will show up in orange. We generally try to avoid redirects in articles as much as possible. - Sir Cavalier of One 17:50, April 9, 2014 (UTC)
I think you've done a solid job expanding the article. Why don't you try your hand at a Personality and traits section? IFYLOFD 02:44, April 11, 2014 (UTC)
- Yeah, give it a shot. Shouldn't be too hard with this guy. 02:52, April 11, 2014 (UTC)
At the moment i'm busy, i'll see if I can run through it tomorrow night :) Supreme Emperor (talk) 03:25, April 11, 2014 (UTC)
Try to find your own project this time. There's no shortage of clone troopers that need improvement, you just need to look for them. IFYLOFD 05:15, April 12, 2014 (UTC)
- No problem. I'm here if you need any help. 05:18, April 12, 2014 (UTC)
A user before you added fanon (unsourced) information (Tarondon being Human and Male). You were completely correct to add the links for both, but as the info is not sourced, I had to remove it and for easier handling undit both your and the other users edits. As a note, Male should be pipelinked to Sexes, like this Male. Clone Commander Lee 13:24, April 12, 2014 (UTC)
I probably won't have time for a few days, very busy IRL at the moment. Sorry. Supreme Emperor (talk) 02:36, April 13, 2014 (UTC)
- If you wanted to get someone else to take a shot at it, it's fine :) At the moment, I have no idea when i'll be able to do it. Sorry. Supreme Emperor (talk) 12:13, April 13, 2014 (UTC)
Yes, it was a serious mistake. As a first time penalty, a fine of $100 is placed on your account. I accept all major credit cards. JangFett 02:52, April 16, 2014 (UTC)
Hello Emperor, I see you are working on the Hawkeye (clone trooper) article, and currently say he was killed. I can tell you that it's my understanding, while one of the troopers was killed, it wasn't clear if it was Hawkeye or Trapper, and thus both articles should just say one of the pair was killed, but as we don't know which, we shouldn't make an assumption. I'd also encourage looking at linking pages for both, and getting rid of anything that would assume a specific one was killed, to purge the site of any such misinformation. Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 03:23, April 16, 2014 (UTC)
- It's making progress, but is by no means ready for quality status yet. For starters, the entire IU portion of the article needs to be sourced, and the personality and traits section is not. Also I notice both missing context and links as well. But as long as these are taken care of, the article should be eligible for GA status. Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 03:56, April 16, 2014 (UTC)
Grunny was voted in as an administrator first and then later a bureaucrat. :P JangFett 17:31, April 23, 2014 (UTC)
Indeed it is, I enjoyed the New Jedi Order series. Supreme Emperor (talk) 15:48, April 25, 2014 (UTC)
I'm sure I will at some point, but being lazy is easier :P Supreme Emperor (talk) 14:27, April 26, 2014 (UTC)
Not sure which trooper you mean, what did they appear in? Supreme Emperor (talk) 22:12, May 7, 2014 (UTC)
Okay, in looking at Hawkeye, I found some things you should change before you nominate it for status. First of all, it is a general rule of thumb to have the body contain everything that both the infobox and the intro have. Currently, you have some infobox exclusive stuff, like Hawkeye finding those troopers and talking to them. For the intro, the body, and the infobox, you should link to everything inside it regardless of whether it is linked elsewhere. Currently, you are missing some links in the body, such as Galactic Republic, Ponds, and so forth, while they have been linked in the intro.
Another thing, I noticed in the article that in the body you claim that Trapper died, while in the infobox and the intro you have Hawkeye dying. It would be good to remain constant. :) Remember to also mention everything relevant in the intro/body. Currently, the intro doesn't actually link/explain the beast at all. Ideally, the intro should be a condensed version of the body, containing all of the important points. Lastly, it is good to give context to some things, so the reader knows what you are talking about. For example, Malastare should probably have some context given to it, i.e "..the planet Malastare." If you have any further questions, just pm me on IRC, or on my talkpage. Good luck and good work. 501st 21:06, May 26, 2014 (UTC)
- I'll just put what I found here. First of all, you still have a few infobox exclusive things, mainly the part where Hawkeye and the others go and find the troopers that were in the hole. That's currently not in the body, so it should be added. Look through your intro and makes sure that everything there is also in the body in some form or another. Also ,remember to link to everything you can in the body. Currently, Galactic Republic is not linked to, nor is clone troopers. There is probably a few more so take a look and see what you can link to in the body. I think you'll need a bit more context in the article as well. For example, the body part of the article should mention the Clone Wars in the Biography, preferably in the first sentence when you are talking about the Separatists and the Republic. Like I said before, the intro doesn't link to or state the beast's name at all, so that should be remedied. Once again, if you have any questions, just let me know. 501st 21:56, June 10, 2014 (UTC)
The first GA I wrote was First skirmish in Cuipernam, and the first CA was Four-Eighteen. Currently, I haven't written any FA's :P Supreme Emperor (talk) 05:05, June 8, 2014 (UTC)
Hello again. I was wondering why many of the TCW articles have the Legends tag on them. Hasn't it been confirmed that TCW would be one of the things that would remain canonical?--172.250.250.99 00:10, June 13, 2014 (UTC)
- TCW exists in both the Legends and Canon timelines --Emperor Jarjarkine 00:14, June 13, 2014 (UTC)
Hello Jarjarkine, I have to admit that I did not watch that TCW episode in question, but from seeing CC and Jang's responses on Trapper's talk page, it seems that we see two clone troopers in armor (Trapper and Hawkeye), and one gets killed by the Zillo Beast while the other escapes, but there's no way to distinguish the two armored clones. Although only fan sites and not valid sources, I also read their articles on the Dutch wiki and the French site anakinworld.com, both of which also indicated it was unclear which trooper was which. I would advise both articles to have text along the lines of "While the rest of the team barely escaped to a gunship with the help of Jedi Knight Anakin Skywalker, one of the troopers fell behind and was crushed by the feet of the beast as it chased the rest of the group." Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 23:23, June 15, 2014 (UTC)
- Scratch that, I actually saw that Trapper's Landing at Point Rain appearance was later verified to have been chronologically after the Zillo Beast episode, per here. However, per EJ's objection, you need to properly cite that info to the Blog entry. Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 23:32, June 15, 2014 (UTC)
Don't worry, for a good article nomination, you get two weeks to handle objections before the nomination is taken off the page.--Exiled Jedi (Greetings) 17:58, June 18, 2014 (UTC)
Well besides the fact that I just don't like that sort of pipelinking by personal preference, Jedi was also already linked later on in the article body, which created an unnecessary double link. Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 02:48, October 1, 2014 (UTC)
When placing templated messages on user talk pages, including welcome messages and warnings, please remember to always substitute the template. This is done so that subsequent changes to the template do not improperly alter the message after it is delivered. Additionally, some templates, including the welcome template, do not work properly if they are not substituted. Thanks. 15:45, October 4, 2014 (UTC)
Hey. I noticed you had a local Global.js file here on Wookieepedia. Global.js files (and Global.css files) only work on Community Central. If you want to update your Global.js, you'll need to do so here. - Brandon Rhea 18:13, October 5, 2014 (UTC)
- No problem. - Brandon Rhea 18:53, October 5, 2014 (UTC)
Thank you very much, it was delicious! I appreciate it. ProfessorTofty (talk) 15:16, November 26, 2014 (UTC)
Hi. I just finished updating Finis Valorum, which you voted for on its ongoing Featured Article nomination, with new information from the book Tarkin. Since you voted for it, this is an FYI so that you're aware of the changes in the event you would like to review them to ensure that you still support the nomination. Let me know if you have any questions. Thanks! - Brandon Rhea 21:19, November 30, 2014 (UTC)
Whatzup bra!
Well, I did my best to speed up the process a little ...
Hope that'll work ... Cannot do much more ... --{{SUBST:User:John_Trololo/sig}} 09:06, December 24, 2014 (UTC)
I noticed some people were mentioning you'd added fanon information in places. The Star Wars Fanon Wiki does exist for stuff like that instead of just deleting your information. I'm a member there myself and I think it's a great site. http://swfanon.wikia.com/wiki/ I hope this can help.--LadyVader Peace is a lie 10:28, December 24, 2014 (UTC)
Fous toi de moi crétin tu m'as obliger à jouer a ton jeu ! 23:59, March 10, 2015 (UTC)
Why you're ban in OPE ? :o
Monkey-d-luffi
why's your username on a clone trooper page as the title? lol?
you are not very smart, are you? I looked through the messages you've gotten & you've gotten several warnings from an admin about your signature, or the admin is being dumb, I'm pretty sure it's both of you XD
Thank you so much it does mean a lot! Apologies if I have come across cocky or dickish, never would intend to be but glad that your thoughts were confirmed. Always trying my best to keep things on here up to date when I can, thank you for the kind message! --Lewisr (talk) 17:34, October 24, 2016 (UTC)
Hey, , due to CC’s indefinite absence, I’ve been given the green-light to take over WP:TCW as Project Leader. As Project Leader, I’m committed to this supervisor role that oversees the maintenance and expansion of all things relating to TCW.
As a participant of the project, I would like for you to take the moment to consider your current status. Any inactive or otherwise uncommitted member, for whatever reason, is subject to removal from the participant list, as noted by CC.
If you’re unsure or not committed, please reply to this message on my talk page or kindly remove your name from the list. Mind you, there’s no hard feelings—you are most welcome to rejoin anytime. As the largest WookieeProject in terms of status articles and participants, and because of TCW’s ongoing popularity, we could use the help. :P
Thanks, JangFett 15:30, January 11, 2018 (UTC)