Talk: Kyle03

Hi! Please stop rewriting the title of the image of Dathomir, thank you. --XXLVenom998 17:34, January 14, 2013 (UTC)

Sorry.

• Absolutely no problem, feel free to edit pages, but the article had to be restored. However, we are counting on You to expand Wookieepedia, too. Happy editing! :) Cheers, --XXLVenom998 18:48, January 14, 2013 (UTC)

Hi! First, I would like to ask you to sign your comments with the Signature button next time, as I wouldn't know who wrote the comment. About your question, I have no idea, seriously. Maybe there are some ways, but I don't know how promotion and all these things work, I am just an average user I think, maybe you should ask an admin about it. Good luck and happy editing! :) --XXLVenom998 13:36, February 1, 2013 (UTC)

Thank you for contributing to Wookieepedia! Please note that at least one of your recent additions added unverified information to a mainspace article. Additions to Wookieepedia's articles must be verifiable by a reliable source per our sourcing policy, and unverified information may be reverted or deleted. Continuing to add unverified information may lead to you being blocked from editing by an administrator. Thank you. JangFett 21:51, February 4, 2013 (UTC)

Please do not add nonsense to Wookieepedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the Jundland Wastes sandbox. Thank you. Cade Calrayn 17:00, March 5, 2013 (UTC)

• Please do not continue to change the infobox image for Asajj Ventress. If you would like to propose a different image, please do so through the article's talk page; experimenting with different images as you are currently doing is not permitted and can be seen as vandalism. Thank you. CadeCalrayn 17:03, March 5, 2013 (UTC)

Darth Hill, "Dark Jedi" is not an organization nor could someone be affiliated to it. It is a term to describe someone. The Barriss Offee and Pong Krell's articles have already acknowledged this through the infobox. Thanks, JangFett 19:14, March 10, 2013 (UTC)

• I'd like to echo Jang's message above. Dark Jedi is not an affiliation. Please don't add it. Thanks. 1358(Talk) 19:24, March 10, 2013 (UTC)

As you have been warned previously, please do not continue to change infobox images to incorrect, old, or lower-quality images. Changes to the infobox images for characters such as Ahsoka Tano and Shaak Ti must be discussed on their respective talk pages, and if you would like an image to be changed, please ask there before changing it yourself. Thank you. Cade Calrayn 16:50, March 12, 2013 (UTC)

As the article for Katooni's lightsaber has been trash compacted, please do not attempt to recreate it. Also, if you are unsure how to properly create an article, please use the Jundland Wastes sandbox for experiments rather than mainspace articles. Thank you, Cade Calrayn 17:18, March 20, 2013 (UTC)

Please stop adding None to the hair fields in infoboxes; by and large the field should be left blank if the species doesn't have hair. Also, please don't double-link—if one color is already linked in the infobox, then please don't add another link to color in another field. Thank you. Cade Calrayn 12:59, July 30, 2015 (UTC)

• Hey Kyle03! I just thought I'd let you know that I've reverted the Tivvy article back to having pale skin color as this matches what's in the body of the article. Generally if you think a change should be made to a status article like Tivvy then it's a good idea to contact the nominator of the article and run the idea by them as they've passed the article through review and usually maintain it themselves. Sorry to bother you. Ayrehead02 (talk) 19:30, December 18, 2015 (UTC)

While your edit is appreciated, the page you just edited currently has a template called {{Inuse}} at the top. This template means that someone is currently working on improving the article, and to avoid edit conflicts, no one other than the placer of the template should edit the page while the message is visible. Thank you for your cooperation. Also, stop adding unnecessary subheaders. None of the headers you've added today are needed. Cade Calrayn 17:47, February 13, 2016 (UTC)

Just because you put in a high-quality, good edit every so often does not excuse inappropriate, out-of-place nonsense edits to various pages around the wiki. Desist adding 'Pink' as the skin color of random Sullustians, or you will be blocked for vandalism. Thank you for understanding. - Commander Boots 17:26, March 19, 2016 (UTC)

• I'm sorry, but I don't know why you've reverted my edits. I only changed the skin color to pink because the source on the Sullustan page says they have either gray or pink skin, so therefore, clearly Sullustans such as Tivvy's pages should have the correct color of their skin! Also, I've not had any admins complain about this before and it's not spam, it's correcting a page. --Kyle03 () 20:46, March 19, 2016 (UTC)

Hi Kyle. I've noticed you make a lot of unnecessary header changes on articles, such as you did here on the Rey article. Adding "Growing her skills" as a sub-header of "Early life" is unnecessary; it doesn't need to fall into that section. Additionally, "Awakening the Force" is a more appropriate term for the Episode VII section than "First Order-Resistance conflict," as the former more accurately reflects her character growth and story. Thanks. - Brandon Rhea 17:53, March 20, 2016 (UTC)

• Looks like we messaged each other around the same time. In regards to the speculation, you didn't source what you added. If there's a tweet where Pablo Hidalgo says Rey learned about the Force from Kylo's mind, please provide it. Thanks! - Brandon Rhea 17:55, March 20, 2016 (UTC)

Hello! I just saw you were active here only a few days ago? Good to see you're still on wikia.

-Decca03

I did because its not necessary to have so many headings for the articles, I'll make the same edits on the other two --Lewisr (talk) 23:03, March 3, 2018 (UTC)

"movieweb.com" is not an official source. See WP:ATT and WP:Sourcing for more information on what constitutes an official, canonical source for in-universe information. OOM 224 ༼༽talk༼༽ 12:41, 5 July 2021 (UTC)

• The article literally includes a statement from Chris Terrio who co-wrote TRoS saying that Leia was a Jedi in IX. It's also pretty obvious from watching the film that Leia has taken up the mantle once again. I can't understand how a quote from a co-writer himself isn't an official source. It's not look like the article is speculative. Kyle03 20:38, 5 July 2021

I saw, though I still feel its unnecessary. Status pages such as Tosan and Zett Jukassa don't for example, and neither do the pages of Darth Sidious, Ben Solo, and probably many more. But its being inconsistently applied so I won't fight it too hard Lewisr (talk) 19:46, 22 July 2021 (UTC)

• For people like Maz I agree its necessary to include, but for Jedi or Sith I don't see it as necessary because by the very fact they were either they are Force-sensitive. For adding it to the status articles (Tosan and Zett) its not up to me to decide, that comes down to the authors of those articles. You can add them to other pages, but I can't promise that others won't remove it if they also felt it was unnecessary, but its upto you Lewisr (talk) 20:12, 22 July 2021 (UTC)

Unless something actually says he was an owner of it, all we have it that he briefly used it, which is not the same as being an owner of the weapon. Lewisr (talk) 16:38, 23 July 2021 (UTC)

• I'd imagine the source provided for Ben Solo actually said he was an owner or something like that, whereas as far as I know, nothing says similar for Finn, until then he should not be listed as an owner. Lewisr (talk) 16:48, 23 July 2021 (UTC)

I would like to thank you for your contributions to Wookieepedia. It is recommended that you use the preview button before you save; this helps you find any errors you have made, and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history. Thanks again. VergenceScatter (talk) 17:49, 23 July 2021 (UTC)

Just because it was licensed that doesn't automatically make it a canonical image Lewisr (talk) 21:54, 23 July 2021 (UTC)

• I asked on our dicord server and it seems we can't really use it on either article (not even in BTS) until we know its canon status Lewisr (talk) 23:02, 23 July 2021 (UTC)

Heya, just to inform you that you are eligible to vote in your Ahsoka Tano infobox CT, and that if you can use the guidance notes on this page for help with setting up your signature. If you'd like any help with that, don't hesitate to ask me! OOM 224 21:24, 1 August 2023 (UTC)

• Thank you for the support. Any help would be greatly appreciated. Kyle03 () 21:26, 1 August 2023 (UTC)

Hey! There isn't much need to list formerly etc in the infobox. It doesn't really look like that, in the same way that it doesn't look like Han was affiliated with all those organisations at the same time, it's just a chronological ordering of his partners/affiliations Lewisr (talk) 14:54, 4 August 2023 (UTC)

Hi Kyle. The partner parameter on Template:Character is only intended for listing life paterners such as ones living in the equivalent of common-law marriages, ones who had children together, or are actually married. The field was renamed to slightly reflect these types of committed relationships while still essentially being for familial relations only. Noticed on some recent edits of yours to Padmé Amidala, Quinlan Vos, and others that you've been adding to these fields with information for romantic interests/boyfriend/girlfriends, which isn't its intended usage. Would be amazing if you could keep this in mind going forward. Cheers, —spookywillowwtalk 02:29, 9 August 2023 (UTC)

• Such a change would have to be discussed in the Senate Hall and brought to a vote afterward—as the original set of parameters/usages was agreed on by a vote prior. The field was actually renamed, not removed (to allow for some very specific edge case flexibility, as general romantic interests can often turn subjective), but was still supposed to follow the intent of the spouse parameter. But—the rename was indeed confusing, so there's an ongoing bot run adding a comment to clarify the field's usage for going forward. Cheers, 21:11, 9 August 2023 (UTC)

Hey, thanks for your contribution on Wookieepedia. I saw your recent edit on Girard and I just want to remind you that gender can't be confirmed only via physical appearance. Cheers! Bonzane10 19:33, 14 September 2023 (UTC)

Is it actually stated to be Ackbar or is it just assuming to be Ackbar? Lewisr (talk) 22:05, 27 September 2023 (UTC)

• It's entirely different, and there was nothing in the episode which referred to the character as an admiral or it being the High Command. It could be any other Mon Calamari, whereas we can easily identify Mon Mothma by her role, and the fact that it's clearly Genevieve O'Reilly. Until a source refers to the character as Ackbar we should reframe from treating it as him Lewisr (talk) 17:40, 28 September 2023 (UTC)

Hey there, Kyle! I'm just letting you know that I reverted your edits on Thongla Jur. The reason is that the article in question is a status article, meaning that it has reached a certain level of quality. It's best to ask the editor who promoted the article if you want to make any changes to it and put it in the edit summary to let others know about the situation. Cheers! Bonzane10 13:00, 28 February 2024 (UTC)

Hi there, Kyle! I just wanted to let you know that I've redirected the Acolyte lightsaber pages to the character pages for now since, as you can see in previous community decisions (like these: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5), lightsabers are generally given their own page when they have a degree of notability by playing into the narrative, having a unique quality, etc., and not just being a mere tool, which is typically covered in the Equipment section on the character page. So it's too early to tell if any of those sabers will have one of these qualities. Hope this helps, AnilSerifoglu (talk) 19:35, 29 May 2024 (UTC)