Talk: Zeta1127,89thLegion

I've noticed you helping with Star Wars Main Title a little. I appreciate the help a lot. Since you show a little interest, would you like to join WookieeProject: Real World Music? MasterFred 12:49, October 20, 2010 (UTC)

Hello Zeta! Just a reminder that you currently have "The Imperial March" as a project for WP:RWM. It's been three weeks since your last edit on the page. If you are still planning on editing the article, do so within the next week if possible. If inactivity is still shown, I may have to take your name off the list of projects. You can look at "Star Wars Main Title" for an example on how to write an OOU music article. Thank you for your time and God bless! MasterFred 19:48, November 8, 2010 (UTC)

I officially don't like this place very much. It has its uses, but you guys are just too strict and narrow-minded for my taste, so I don't think I will be able to do a whole lot here. This statement isn't meant to be offensive, only an opinion. Zeta1127 of the 89th Legion () 02:43, December 19, 2010 (UTC)

Hi, just wanted to let you know that doing whitespace edit just to be able to communicate via edit summaries is not nice thing to do, as it causes unnecessary edit history noise and goes against the idea of edit summary, it is supposed to summarize the edit, not to comment (see Help:Edit summary). Please use article/user talk pages instead, as they are more fitted to the purpose, thanks. –Tm_T  20:33, December 29, 2010 (UTC)

If you know how to add a notes and references thing to the Battle of Carida could you I don't know how? User:Grand Moff Hopkins

These ships were Imperial-class Star Destroyers modified by the New Republic and/or Galactic Alliance to posses gravity well projector globes internally.

• Bail Organa
• Elegos A'Kla
• Mon Mothma

Curious how did you get the 89th Legion part of your name? I've been working on making my own legion and called it the 89th71.209.84.5 03:36, February 11, 2011 (UTC)

Per this discussion, unless we have canonical proof that those ships were named after the Roman/Latin/whatever foreign language, then it needs to be removed. I don't necessarily agree with it, but I had it confirmed by an administrator. <-Omicron 20:41, February 14, 2011 (UTC)

Hey, what exactly was Omicron reverting of yours? He's been removing 'unverified' info on the Jizz article as well. Destroying the wiki. I want to know so he can be reported. --Thesaurus Rex 01:20, February 16, 2011 (UTC)

Hey there Zeta. I've contacted you as you're the most recent editor of the XvT article.

I've discovered an Easter Egg in BoP that features a cameo by the game testers (as evidenced by their names in-game and their designation as members of Bantha Squadron - they are credited as the Banthas in the XvT manual). My question is does this appearance, as it takes place in an actual mission in-game, render these characters and the squadron (as well as the ships they appear with) canonical? The whole episode is very jokey, with ships named Dead Meat and Already Dead being taken down by the Banthas.

To find the Easter Egg, play the BoP Combat Engagement 'Attack on Rebel Cruisers' (my memory may not be exactly right on this) as Rebels (haven't tried it as Imps yet) and, after all three cruisers are either destroyed or have went into hyperspace, wait for 9 minutes and 40 seconds. The Imperial team must have summoned reinforcements (which may need to be done by the CPU as opposed to a player). Two ISDs will show up and launch a squad of pathetically weak T/Is. About 3 mins after this, two CRSs will arrive, pursuing the ISDs, and Bantha squad will launch to take out the two ships.

I know this sounds very stupid, but you can corroborate what I'm saying by opening the mission in an editor.

Anyway, let me know what you think.ChebGhobbi 00:02, April 18, 2011 (UTC)

Hey Zeta1127, I noticed you've been trying to add a "Known ships" section to the Braha'tok-class gunship page, which I'm currently bringing up to Featured Article status. However, a "Known ships" section is not part of the Starship and Vehicle Class Articles' Layout Guide, which you can see here: Wookieepedia:Layout Guide. Before adding sections to a page, make sure it corresponds to the Layout Guide. Thanks. Kilson 03:38, June 4, 2011 (UTC)

SInce you are a huge Star Wars Fan can you help me out with the Magna Guard article. Mostly just adding sources and appearances and adding to the Bibliography. Thanks,--kangaroopowahTalk 02:38, June 16, 2011 (UTC)

i have a question . why did you delete behind the scenes ? Did i do something wrong ?

Ok , but could someone edited it to make it informative

I am being stalked, I am removing all things connecting individual websites with each other.

I have a serious stalking problem... I am destroying anything that connects websites I go too from each other...

I can't figure anything out

Hey, Zeta1127,89thLegion, I just want to let you know that please be more careful when you're editing in FAs, or in any promoted articles for that matter. If you take a look at CC-1119, I corrected a mistake you made in the intro. The comma after mentioning the clone's nickname, "Appo," needs to go inside the quotation marks. This is grammatically correct and should also be present in non-promoted articles as well. I just wanted to let you know just in case this occurs in the future. JangFett 22:55, August 29, 2011 (UTC)

As an editor of media timelines, your input is desired: Forum:SH:Making_a_better_"Timeline_of_media" --Morbus Iff 17:23, August 31, 2011 (UTC)

Please do not change the name in the infobox. His name is Anakin Skywalker. Using Darth Vader is inappropriate as established by the Naming convention policy and as referred to in the discussion on the article's talk page. Gethralkin 15:46, January 14, 2012 (UTC)

• What exactly is the difference between adding Darth Vader to the infobox and adding Darth Sidious and Darth Tyranus to their respective pages? Darth Plagueis was already renamed to his Sith title and Darth Tenebrous should probably be renamed to his Sith title too. Zeta1127 of the 89th Legion () 19:24, January 14, 2012 (UTC)

Why did you take away the information of Nico Okarr's death, demise means death. --24.115.227.131 02:19, February 7, 2012 (UTC)

Hello, I would ask that you please provide a reference citation for your edit here regarding this conflict being referred canonically as the "Battle of Falleen's Fist." Thank you. Toprawa and Ralltiir 05:09, February 10, 2012 (UTC)

Do not remove perfectly good edits. They are not vandalism. Please see this new policy. Thanks, JangFett 03:32, April 1, 2012 (UTC)

• I know this nonsense is just April Fool's, Halo Nation is already going My Little Pony. Zeta1127 of the 89th Legion () 03:34, April 1, 2012 (UTC)

Hey Zeta, I noticed you've been doing a lot of work with the EGW lately. Do you want to join WookieeProject Warfare? We'd love to have anyone who has the guide and is willing to help out—or even if you don't have it. Just sign your name with a #~~~ in the Participants section to join. Thanks! —Cade Calrayn 16:20, April 10, 2012 (UTC)

• Think I will join the project, though I am rather annoyed by the way the Mandator III-class dreadnought and Praetor Mark II-class battlecruiser are named at the moment. Why can't they be named Mandator III-class Star Dreadnought and Praetor II-class Star Battlecruiser, because they are clearly derivatives of the Mandator-class Star Dreadnought line and Praetor-class Star Battlecruiser respectively? And why isn't the Mandator line spelled Dreadnought like the other Star Dreadnoughts?

Welcome! —Cade Calrayn <

You changed the class of this ship from a Interdictor-cruiser to an Interdictor-Star Destroyer? Which source do you used for that (article:talkpage)? --Modgamers 22:00, April 13, 2012 (UTC)

Hi.

You undid my edit on the Imperial Navy with the reason being that the cloaked Executor in Rebel Strike was actually a contemporary for the Terror ship in Rebel Assault II. Can you tell me what you meant by that, and can you give me the source for it? Weedle McHairybug 23:56, April 28, 2012 (UTC)

• The is an Executor-class Star Dreadnought, not some anonymous SSD, and therefore doesn't belong under Super Star Destroyer, since the Executor-class is already there. Contemporary means the Cloaked Executor is similar to the Terror, and it should probably be renamed to Executor-class Star Dreadnought (cloaking device) or something similar. Zeta1127 of the 89th Legion () 00:07, April 29, 2012 (UTC)

Zeta, I'd love your input here. Feel free to ask for assistance on your work with the starship classes—you've been doing great work. Cade Calrayn 13:54, May 1, 2012 (UTC)

Isn't the CEC, Rothana Heavy Engineering and many more corporations Republic organizations.

• No, those shipwrights and corporations are not Republic organizations, because they aren't a part of the Republic government. Zeta1127 of the 89th Legion () 00:58, May 11, 2012 (UTC)

From imperial dark jedi please this message must be ansered Hi zeta1127 i would like to tell you something you see there is a problem i have searched the history of the empire reborn and there is nothing to confirm that they have completly destroyed so would like to write on the page that they didn't dissolved what's your opinion

• Sorry to intrude, Zeta. From the Empire Reborn article: "With the crystallizing star dragged dangerously into the black hole, the entire Crseih Station was slaved to the Millennium Falcon and together they jumped into hyperspace to the Codru system. The remaining Proctors and many of Hethrir's supporters were rounded up and arrested on the station. With Hethrir, Fyyar and Desann killed, the Empire Reborn movement collapsed. Aware of its existence, Leia pledged to find the remaining Empire Youth saboteurs. Some remained at large and eventually joined Desann's former apprentice Tavion Axmis, in a Sith cult, called the Disciples of Ragnos. The cult was later destroyed by the joint efforts of Luke Skywalker, Kyle Katarn, and his new apprentice Jaden Korr." That's proof enough that the Empire Reborn is destroyed. For more info, just look at the sources in the article itself. CadeCalrayn 16:24, May 17, 2012 (UTC)

Glad to see I'm not alone with that stupid Clone Wars thing. I love that Timeline of media page. It's just so unreasonable to manage the Clone Wars stuff on there. (and they're not even good stories!) The old Clone Wars timeline is so much smoother. I'm often on this site, but I don't make many edits. (I'm more active on Wikipedia that way) With Star Wars, the timeline means a lot to me. I'm tired of the crap. I'm gonna assume a bit of control over that article. I've been observing it for several years now. This Clone Wars thing just isn't working. Maybe I should develop my profile page a bit too now that I'm back. --EwokSithLord 00:15, May 31, 2012 (UTC)

• I feel your pain on the stupid Clone Wars thing. I don't do a whole lot of work with the timeline pages beyond fixing people's mistakes when they add things, and I like them too. I can't stand the constant retcons and the baseless introduction of things without a mention in the existing EU, and from what I have also heard the stories aren't even that good. I will be glad to help you with this in any way I can. Zeta1127 of the 89th Legion () 00:46, May 31, 2012 (UTC)

Please do not move sourcebook pages to include the subtitle section. Those should not be included in the page title, as they are a subtitle, not the main title of the book. Thanks. - JMAS 02:18, September 13, 2013 (UTC)

• Then do the same for Enter the Unknown and change all of the links for both. Zeta1127 of the 89th Legion () 02:26, September 13, 2013 (UTC)