Talk: Darth Ravigious

Do not copy content from other Wikia sites. Doing so without attribution is a copyright violation and any such content will be immediately deleted from the site. Thank you. 1358 (Talk) 15:00, September 22, 2014 (UTC)

I'm not sure what you're trying to accomplish, but please stop copying the SWTOR wiki's articles. Additionally, there's absolutely no reason for a "Sith Warrior Storyline" article; that's why we have articles on the class characters. Cade Calrayn 15:00, September 22, 2014 (UTC)

Alright, sorry. I just joined, so, now I know. And just disregard the message I left on your wall. I did not get this one until after I left it.

Darth Ravigious () 15:03, September 22, 2014 (UTC)

Hey. Please be sure to add a description, source, license, and categories to File:Yularen old.png. You can read about how to do that in the image policy. If you have any questions about how to do this, please feel free to let me know. Thanks! - Brandon Rhea 00:17, November 13, 2014 (UTC)

I found it on TCW wiki, but I am having a hard time finding the official source.

http://clonewars.wikia.com/wiki/File:Yularen_detail.png

Darth Ravigious () 00:31, November 13, 2014 (UTC)

• To be honest, this looks fan-made. I've removed it from the page you added it to as a result. Unless a source is added ASAP, an admin will end up deleting the image. As a best practice, you shouldn't ever upload an image unless you know (and have added) the source. - Brandon Rhea 00:33, November 13, 2014 (UTC)

Thank you for contributing to Wookieepedia! Please note that at least one of your recent additions added unverified information to a mainspace article. Additions to Wookieepedia's articles must be verifiable by a reliable source per our sourcing policy, and unverified information may be reverted or deleted. Continuing to add unverified information may lead to you being blocked from editing by an administrator. Thank you. Trip391 (talk) 03:56, November 14, 2014 (UTC)

• Sorry. I accidentally edited the Legends articles as well. "Tarkin" states that he was director of the organization. I will be sure to cite in the canon articles.

Darth Ravigious () 03:57, November 14, 2014 (UTC)

Hi there! I noticed your new article on Harus Ison had a couple of formatting issues. When specifying something like Tarkin in appearances, use this to make sure it appears formatted properly: ''[[Tarkin (novel)|Tarkin]]''.

Also, for first appearance, just use {{1st}}. ProfessorTofty (talk) 18:14, November 14, 2014 (UTC)

Hello, Ravigious. I've got a few things and tips that you should take into account while editing. Going off of this revision:

• article should have the {{Top}} template, and every canon article (unless they have /Canon in their title) requires {{Top|type=canon}}. This is needed to categorize the article by its continuity and to display the proper era icons and banners.
• Entries in Appearances sections should be listed with bullet points, or * in wikitext, and should by and large be italicized (particularly with novels). Similarly, the novel Tarkin should be listed as ''[[Tarkin (novel)|Tarkin]]'', using a pipelink to hide the parenthetical.
• Every article needs to have categories. If a person's gender is not specified, use Category:Individuals of unspecified gender, and for species it's Category:Individuals of unspecified species.
• You've clearly been using the VisualEditor, which is fine for quick fixes, but I'd strongly suggest you use a source editor in order to prevent the major template-formatting errors that VisualEditor leaves behind at the moment. All infoboxes should retain all of their parameters, even if the fields are empty. Thanks. CadeCalrayn 18:15, November 14, 2014 (UTC)

Hi! I saw your message at Brandon's wall and I thought I might be able to give you a few tips on helping out. First, if you haven't already, take a few minutes to read over the information in Wookieepedia:Manual of style, on the pages canon and Star Wars Legends and Wookieepedia:FAQ. I know it's a lot, but you don't have to read it thoroughly, but try to at least browse through it. Second, another good thing to do would be to have a look around at the articles on the site, try to get yourself familiar with the format and have a look at the code too-- make sure if you haven't already, you turn off that visual editor, which isn't approved here, and get to know the layout. Then, if you have any questions, feel free to ask. ProfessorTofty (talk) 15:34, November 20, 2014 (UTC)

I saw your note to Cade about how you want to make sure that the Revan article is perfect. That's totally fine. Because it's a candidate for Featured Article, however, it would be best to leave suggestions on the nomination page here. That way, Cade—as the nominator/primary author—can respond to them. - Brandon Rhea 15:54, November 20, 2014 (UTC)

I'll probably also bring up the use of mullet man, as the edition of the pictures seem to be speculations.

You guys have been great here, BTW. Not stodgy like the guys on other wikis I've been on (and I was worried at first, as SW fans tend to be the most hardcore out of any fandom)

Darth Ravigious () 16:58, November 20, 2014 (UTC)

Canon articles are not to be made by copy and pasting content from Legends articles, but simply removing Legends details, links, and sources, or removing the Legends eras and setting the type to Canon. They must be written from scratch. While some information may be shared between Canon and Legends, copying or transferring from Legends is not always accurate, is poor editing practice (plagiarism is never allowed), and is not to be done. Trip391 (talk) 16:34, November 21, 2014 (UTC)

You have been asked about this before; please make sure that any infoboxes you add have all of their parameters, even if they're empty, such as the one you just added on Outlander Club. ProfessorTofty (talk) 16:53, November 21, 2014 (UTC)

I don't remember that ever being told that before, but will-do!

Also, I will fix the canon redirect. Accidentally got rid of it. Darth Ravigious () 16:56, November 21, 2014 (UTC)

Hi. Please be sure to check out the question I posted . Thanks! - Brandon Rhea 15:24, December 3, 2014 (UTC)

I feel like your addition to Dark Lord of the Sith might be wandering a little bit too far into Legends territory—terms like "Sith empires" (in plural) might be better off in the Legends version. In addition, sentences like "Following the deaths of Vader and Sidious during the Battle of Endor, no one was left to claim the title..." are very speculative and should be avoided. Hope this clears things up. Cheers, 1358 (Talk) 23:14, December 28, 2015 (UTC)

• Interesting. Although I feel that might still be too little context for a material, especially as we tend to avoid articles covering multiple things on the same page. The Sith article is probably the right place for a mention, but it seems like it's already covered there. Cheers, 1358(Talk) 11:06, December 29, 2015 (UTC)

Hello. When reverting vandalism, please make sure to report the incident on this page and/or notify an administrator on their talk page or on IRC so that we can properly handle the problem. Otherwise, the incident may go unnoticed and the offender will most likely continue. Thank you. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 17:52, January 21, 2016 (UTC)

• Alright, will do Toprawa and Ralltiir. I've also noticed more vandalism than usual here. Additionally, are admins the only ones who are allowed to warn other users not to vandalize, as I have seen normal editors do it before as well Darth Ravigious () 18:57, January 21, 2016 (UTC)

First of all, thanks for contacting me directly to discuss the article! That list has turned into more of a catch all list of worlds that a list of planets, so no, there is no canon evidence that it is a planet. Second, I would like to discuss rolling the article back to its condition before your edits. In my opinion, the page was more concise before you split the first sentence into two. - AV-6R7 00:55, January 27, 2016 (UTC)

• Yeah, that could be cool. However, that would probably best be done through IRC, so as to not clog up our talk pages. Also, I believe that the first sentence will read better one we get a proper name for the conflict. - AV-6R7 01:29, January 27, 2016 (UTC)

Actually, I added the template because that quote refers to the planet Mandalore, not the title. However, the page doesn't need to be deleted outright as the title was canonized in Star Wars: The Clone Wars: The Complete Season Two, which I intend to add information on. - AV-6R7 01:12, January 29, 2016 (UTC)

I don't really have the jurisdiction to determine if it's Wiki-appropriate, but I'd be more than happy to look it over! However, I'm a tad skeptical; while a conflict may have been mentioned here or there, I'm not sure it'd be article-worthy (due to a lack of context). Cwedin 20:45, March 29, 2016 (UTC)

Hi. I wanted to let you know that I've tagged "Jedi-Mandalorian Conflict" for deletion. Although it's well-written, it's almost entirely based on conjecture and speculation. Most of what you attribute to The Clone Wars was not actually stated in The Clone Wars. For example:

That's attributed to "The Mandalore Plot," but that can't actually be found in that episode. All we know from that episode is that the Jedi and the Mandalorians once fought each other. That's not enough to base an article on. The article suggests that what could be a series of events is one event (you called the article "Conflict"—singular). We just don't know anything at this point beyond "they fought, there were crusaders involved, and there are murals about them." We can't even pinpoint a specific event.

I noticed in the edit history that you were linking it with the Mandalorians Wars as well, based on what the Mandalorian Wars page does. I'm guessing that how the Legends page treats the reference from The Clone Wars may be the source of the issue here. It's likely that, at some point, a Legends source drew a connection and said that what the show was referring to was the Mandalorian Wars. However, none of that is applicable anymore, so we can only go what's based on the show (since no other canon sources talk about this in any further detail), and all we have is a vague reference to historical conflicts.

If you have any questions about this, feel free to let me know. Thanks! - Brandon Rhea 12:12, April 4, 2016 (UTC)

• Well, the new canon is only 2 years old and right now is largely based from Episode III onward. We can't expect to know everything so quickly. I'm sure we'll find out more about the ancient past eventually. In regards to the other articles, if those articles say that then they are incorrect as well. When creating articles in the future, remember that Wookieepedia is not a source. You should be able to independently verify all information you add to a page. - Brandon Rhea 13:47, April 4, 2016 (UTC)

Hi Ravigious! Please don't forget to strike with <s></s> your objection on the Rakata Prime nomination page, as more than a week has passed since it has been replied to. Also, don't forget to sign your comments with ~~~~. Thanks! Imperators II 08:18, April 23, 2016 (UTC)

• Sorry. I've been inactive the past week due to preparation for exams. I think I tried signing my comment but it ended up screwing up the page for some reason :PDarth Ravigious () 20:57, April 24, 2016 (UTC)

Yep, that's me. I'm not much of a fan but I got caught in the Poe Dameron comic so I thought I could help a little bit.--Uskok (talk) 14:37, May 5, 2016 (UTC)

What do you mean that the Outlander is not multiple people? Just asking a question and trying to help if i did anything wrong then i take full responsibility for my actions.

If you do not mind, would you like to show me where it was discussed? Probuscis (talk) 05:44, June 9, 2016 (UTC)

• I have no idea. This was a year ago, as soon as the trailer was released. Boyd said that it may or may not be in the final game. He is not saying that Malgus is dead. For now, all we have to go off of is the clip. It is currently accepted as canon, and will be until stated otherwise. Darth Ravigious () 05:50, June 9, 2016 (UTC)

• Thanks anyways for informing me. P.s. the initial comment might have sounded passive aggressive, I did not mean it to end up that way. Probuscis (talk) 05:56, June 9, 2016 (UTC)

Hello Darth Ravigious. You currently have an unstruck objection on Rakata Prime on the CAN page. Could you please take a peek at it when you have a second? Thanks, Supreme Emperor (talk) 02:02, June 29, 2016 (UTC)

I've read both books; the article you created already exist under another name. Thus, I marked it for deletion. - AV-6R7 17:19, July 15, 2016 (UTC)

Hi there! I'm glad you've added a quick summary of the events of Life Debt to the Galactic Empire page that I'm currently working on. The only thing is... well... that I'm currently working on it, and had placed an Inuse template at the top of the page, asking that no edits be made to the page while it is active. While your edit did not in anyway conflict with my current work on the page, (in fact, I had not heard of Pablo's tweet about the remaining Imperial states, so a thank-you for informing me of the fact!) I must point out—at least as a reminder of policy—but it is considered rude and disruptive to edit a page with the template active, as it has the possibility of causing edit conflicts. I thank-you for your work on the Star Wars wiki, and hope to see you around the site!

P.S. Can you send me a link to Pablo's tweet? I cannot find it on his Twitter feed. Thanks! - Commander Boots 21:05, July 16, 2016 (UTC)

• Thanks for your appreciation! Also, I did mention the remnant factions in both the infobox to the Galactic Empire article, along with putting it into the "Legacy" subheading. Putting it into "Signing the Treaty" or any other section would be premature, since we don't know exactly when the Empire ceased to exist and the numerous independent nations that took its place. - 03:41, July 18, 2016 (UTC)

Hello! Just to make things clear, I wanted to point out where Sidious' estimated birth date was derived from. In Tarkin, which takes place 8 years after Episode III, Wilhuff Tarkin is said to be 50, which places his birth 45 years before Episode III (in other words, 64 years before the Battle of Yavin). The book also says that "Sidious had recognized Tarkin, some twenty years his junior, as a fellow colonial." --LelalMekha (talk) 09:07, September 7, 2016 (UTC)

Hey thanks for reaching out! Was literally just about to leave you a message saying I'm going fix it up a little bit, but after I remove the inuse tag then feel free to make any further changes --Lewisr (talk) 23:55, July 16, 2017 (UTC)

• I'm glad we are too! Thanks for expanding the pages --Lewisr (talk) 01:04, July 17, 2017 (UTC)

The remnants are already included in the Date fragmented section, the Date reorganized section is used for the provisional government because that was the official or accepted successor of the Empire--DarthRuiz30 (talk) 20:37, July 19, 2017 (UTC)

Can you point me to where the Taris system is mentioned in Tarkin? Can't see anything in my ebook --Lewisr (talk) 23:03, July 20, 2017 (UTC)

HAHA you're so right! I didn't even realise until you said it, nice spot! --Lewisr (talk) 10:45, July 21, 2017 (UTC)

I understand and I agree it should be there! I tried to also get the link but I can't on my phone, I can later on unless someone does so in the meantime --Lewisr (talk) 20:18, July 22, 2017 (UTC)

• Sounds fine with me, let me know when you wanna chat and we can arrange something --Lewisr (talk) 00:58, July 23, 2017 (UTC)

I'll take a look through it when I get some time but thanks for doing it! --Lewisr (talk) 00:41, July 24, 2017 (UTC)

• I tend to agree with that, it seems to be connected together so merging them together seemed the most appropriate action in this situation --Lewisr (talk) 00:46, July 24, 2017 (UTC)

I don't recall seeing anything, but its worth a look around to see if there is anything that would be suitable --Lewisr (talk) 00:36, July 31, 2017 (UTC)

It's assumed that the choices that grant the most dark side points are chosen. --Rakhsh (talk) 16:38, August 7, 2017 (UTC)

Please correct the content in the articles for Nomen Karr and Jaesa Willsaam to reflect that. --Rakhsh (talk) 16:41, August 7, 2017 (UTC)

The topic has been addressed for both factions and alignments in Forum:CT:TOR and video game canon#Multiple light-side or dark-side options in a single choice. --Rakhsh (talk) 16:52, August 7, 2017 (UTC)

Let's aim to have that discussion resolved. --Rakhsh (talk) 17:04, August 7, 2017 (UTC)

• You remember the part of the Jedi Knight story where Moorint and 2 other Pilgrims betray the Padawan and you are given 3 choices with dealing with them? 2 of those options are Light Side; the option that involves using a mind trick gives more Light Side points than just simply trying to reason with them. --Rakhsh (talk) 17:18, August 7, 2017 (UTC)

The page was deleted previously due to a lack of notability. You'll notice that the page had a similar title to what you made. You mentioned this in the page 'Multiple descendants of Tarsus would also rise to the position of Supreme Chancellor, such as Finis, the penultimate leader of the Galactic Republic', this is speculation as I don't recall this being said anywhere in canon, especially the name Tarsus. --Lewisr (talk) 19:35, August 8, 2017 (UTC)

• Yeah pretty much we just don't have enough right now to make the page, if we had the characters name that would be enough to make it, but having it at Valorum is basically like saying Unidentified member of House Valorum and having the info on that page! Haha no worries, it was a while ago so you might have missed it! --Lewisr (talk) 19:42, August 8, 2017 (UTC)

It's not down to me to decide, I feel that if it was important enough it would have been noted at the time of the page achieving its status. Next to nothing (if at all anything) has come out in the past 3 years since its had status as a featured article that would make changes necessary, but if you're going to make changes you really should discuss it on its talk page first. Regrading the actual fall of the Old Republic page, I don't really know what you should do, how do you know that all of those events are part of the fall? I don't really know enough to decide what you should do on that page --Lewisr (talk) 17:50, August 15, 2017 (UTC)

• He didn't say the Mandalorian Wars, he only mentioned the Darksaber theft, we don't know that the Darksaber theft takes place during the Mandalorian Wars in either canon or legends (as far as I know). As I said already I don't know enough to make a complete judgement but if you feel there's enough evidence then proceed as you had planned too --Lewisr (talk) 18:27, August 15, 2017 (UTC)

I don't see any mention of that, until you can find any reference to that I'm going to remove it. There is no such thing as a Sith Spirit so I don't see any need for it to have a page, any sort of difference could be on the Force spirit page --Lewisr (talk) 21:15, August 20, 2017 (UTC)

• I believe he's referring to Sith artifact in Aftermath. I'm not sure how that can be interpreted that way. There's definitely not a single Sith or Dark Side Spirit (consciousness after death) in that book. There is no proof that the Presence in Rebels is a conscious spirit. In fact, Dave Filoni specifically stated that there are no Sith Spirits/Ghosts in canon during the BTS video about why Revan never made the cut into an episode of TCW. --ChristopherLeeGallant (talk) 06:33, August 21, 2017 (UTC)

" If you want to define real-world Centrism and source that definition to something reputable", you're missing the source--DarthRuiz30 (talk) 19:20, September 29, 2017 (UTC)

Please add the source to the information you're adding there. For example "the noble houses that made up the Aristocra" where does it say that, if the book never says Noble houses then we shouldn't mention or "The Chiss Ascendancy was a hegemonic empire and was comprised of interconnected sovereignties governed" where it says that it says that it was comprised of interconnected sovereignties. I might be blind and not see it, but if its yor interpretation then you should be careful to not add something that its not explicitly defined--DarthRuiz30 (talk) 21:21, August 19, 2018 (UTC)

Thank you for contributing to Wookieepedia! Please note that at least one of your recent additions added unverified information to a mainspace article. Additions to Wookieepedia's articles must be verifiable by a reliable source per our sourcing policy, and unverified information may be reverted or deleted. Continuing to add unverified information may lead to you being blocked from editing by an administrator. Thank you. --DarthRuiz30 (talk) 08:20, June 30, 2019 (UTC)

• Stop adding the information without a source, neither Tarkin or Thrawn mentions the World War, etc. Either you source it correctly or its going to be removed again--DarthRuiz30 (talk) 08:22, June 30, 2019 (UTC)

Do not change the dates of SWTOR without a source, as it was explained in this forum, Andronikos who returns during the Nathema flashpoint states that Rit has been 6 years since the carbonite freezing. Tweets and words from authors, "authorial intent" isn't supposed to be accepted, so please provide a reason--DarthRuiz30 (talk) 04:03, July 16, 2019 (UTC)

• Tweets aren't sources, as I said until Nathema its still mentioned that its been 6 years since the Carbon freexing. We're currently in progress of removing any tweet source that isn't from an official account. The tweet won't be used as a source.--DarthRuiz30 (talk) 05:12, July 16, 2019 (UTC)

Thank you for contributing to Wookieepedia! Please note that at least one of your recent additions added unverified information to a mainspace article. Additions to Wookieepedia's articles must be verifiable by a reliable source per our sourcing policy, and unverified information may be reverted or deleted. Continuing to add unverified information may lead to you being blocked from editing by an administrator. Thank you. --DarthRuiz30 (talk) 21:13, February 2, 2020 (UTC)