Talk: RC-0407

Hello, please don't forget to sign your name on talk pages using four tildes: ~. Thanks!--Vitus Infinitus 17:37, January 9, 2018 (UTC)

Please don't link those free/illegal comic reading websites on edit summaries. Thanks--DarthRuiz30 (talk) 09:17, January 31, 2018 (UTC)

The reason I removed TIE pilot corps from the infobox is because its unnecessary to list everything when its part of the navy which is already listed on there, otherwise the infobox gets unnecessarily long if we listed every single thing --Lewisr (talk) 18:29, February 12, 2018 (UTC)

Hello, please stop adding that information in on Adelhard's article. That is pure speculation and it's not relevant to the article. Please be aware of the three-revert rule, thanks!--Vitus Infinitus 18:38, February 20, 2018 (UTC)

Hi RC-0407. I've removed the Battlefront II wiki external link you added to Reconfigurable blaster‎‎ since we don't generally link to other wikis, only unique sources of information about the article's subject. Ayrehead02 (talk) 11:09, March 3, 2018 (UTC)

Hello I reverted your edit on Phasma's page as it can't really be sourced to episode VII. Also please be careful with your grammar etc as some of it didn't really make sense. Also what do you mean by she fired her blaster 'the proper way'? That sort of stuff isn't really helpful to readers --Lewisr (talk) 17:34, March 8, 2018 (UTC)

Good morning, RC-0407. The List of First Order pilots was deleted because we don't keep lists like that. Hope this helps, Supreme Emperor (talk) 16:37, March 10, 2018 (UTC)

Thank you for contributing to Wookieepedia! Please note that at least one of your recent additions added unverified information to a mainspace article. Additions to Wookieepedia's articles must be verifiable by a reliable source per our sourcing policy, and unverified information may be reverted or deleted. Continuing to add unverified information may lead to you being blocked from editing by an administrator. Thank you. Additionally, we do not keep huge lists in articles, we have categories for things like that. Please do not re-add them. Supreme Emperor (talk) 16:52, March 10, 2018 (UTC)

While all good-faith contributions to Wookieepedia are appreciated, we ask that you please refer to Wookieepedia:Images, which can be found under the "other policies and guidelines" link in your welcome message, and familiarize yourself with the sourcing and licensing requirements before uploading any more images. The only uploading method supported by Wookieepedia, Special:Upload, will prompt you to enter this information. Wikia's non-standard upload forms are not supported under Wookieepedia policy, and ignorance of the uploading rules is not an acceptable excuse. Continued violation of the image policy or falsification of any information in an upload description are considered vandalism and will likely result in a block. Thank you. 1358 (Talk) 16:09, March 13, 2018 (UTC)

Please fix your referencing to do it like I've been fixing your edits. Or at least take a look at [[Wookieepedia:Sourcing|this link to learn how to do so, thanks --Lewisr (talk) 16:58, March 15, 2018 (UTC)

Hey, thanks for contributing! I noticed there were some errors with some of your edits, particularly in references and some layout issues. You can find information here: Wookieepedia:Layout Guide and Wookieepedia:Sourcing. For the layout, there shouldn't be any spaces between == headers, or * bullets, and in regards to references make sure the first reference of a source goes like <ref name="Name">Source</ref> and continued references of the same source are like <ref name="Name" />. When creating articles make sure you add a Notes and references section at the bottom with {{Reflist}} to have the reference list, otherwise an error will pop up at the bottom. Thanks and I hope this helps! Let me know if you have any questions--Vitus Infinitus 16:29, March 18, 2018 (UTC)

Hello, when you edit, please make sure you reference and source the information in the same edit, not go back and finish it later. Also don't leave spaces == in the headers or * bullets and the word, thanks!--Vitus Infinitus 13:57, March 20, 2018 (UTC)

Hello, thanks for the message, no problem and I'm always happy to help out when I can so always feel free to ask if you need any. Its okay on grammar, I guess English isn't your first language so of course not everything will be perfect. Glad to hear and see that you have been able to learn to do the references, thanks for all your edits! Apologies if I've ever come across as harsh or anything, that wasn't my intention. May the Force be with you too, also please remember to sign your posts using the signature button --Lewisr (talk) 19:16, March 28, 2018 (UTC)

• I am still leaning!!!!!!! And don't worry. You haven't been more then a meaningful gentleman. So good luck and the best wishes from you easten neighbor in Scandinavia. --RC-0407 () 21:44, March 28, 2018

Hello! I managed to fix it for you, just one of the references was wrong but its all good now! By the way the Bad Batch stuff doesn't count as legends as its canon only --Lewisr (talk) 20:54, March 29, 2018 (UTC)

• Thanks --RC-0407 () 10:49, March 29, 2018

Hey, so I previously removed your edit because it did not follow the MOS and because it did not have references or sources. Please, when you edit, make sure to add references in the same edit as when you add information, otherwise it may be removed. If you need to make several edits and they are not complete, don't hesitate to use the {{Inuse}} or {{WIP}} templates while you work, that way people know that your work is not complete. There were also some repetitive unit types that were listed below and I removed those as well. If you have any questions let me know, thanks--Vitus Infinitus 17:52, April 3, 2018 (UTC)

Thank you for contributing to Wookieepedia! Please note that at least one of your recent additions added unverified information to a mainspace article. Additions to Wookieepedia's articles must be verifiable by a reliable source per our sourcing policy, and unverified information may be reverted or deleted. Continuing to add unverified information may lead to you being blocked from editing by an administrator. Thank you. You have been warned about this before, so please pay attention to this advice to avoid a block. Tommy Macaroni 20:58, April 7, 2018 (UTC)

• Please respect this. All additions must be sourced, or else they will be removed. Thank you. 10:47, May 6, 2018 (UTC)

Thank you for contributing to Wookieepedia! Please note that at least one of your recent additions added unverified information to a mainspace article. Additions to Wookieepedia's articles must be verifiable by a reliable source per our sourcing policy, and unverified information may be reverted or deleted. Continuing to add unverified information may lead to you being blocked from editing by an administrator. Thank you. Tommy Macaroni 12:51, May 6, 2018 (UTC)

• I don't have an prober reply for you. But for the first time, I got your message. This was written by RC-0407 on 23 day of the 5 month at 21:43 in the German time zone.

Sorry I did see your message and when I went to check the link it was gone, then I forgot to reply to your message. I was away when you first messaged so couldn't help you out, apologies --Lewisr (talk) 12:17, May 28, 2018 (UTC)

• No problem amigo. I know for a fact that you help a lot of people. And that's the only thing that counts. Besides, I nominate it for delesion(delete). As long as this wiki looks good, then I'm happy. And have a nice day, young English-man. RC-0407 ()

While I appreciate your trying to add in more details to various articles, Negastrike Platoon is not an Imperial Army platoon, it's a Stormtrooper Corps platoon. The source they originated from, Star Wars: Imperial Handbook: A Commander's Guide, while released after the Legends/Canon split, was designated Legends. In the Legends continuity, the Stormtrooper Corps were a wholly separate branch in the Imperial Military from both the Imperial Army and the Imperial Navy (think along the lines of the Marine Corps). Them being an elite unit of the Imperial Army was the invention of the Disney Canon after the split (maybe a slight bit before due to Rebels promotional material pointing to that direction). If you're going to add categories to that article, it's better if you created a new category called Stormtrooper Corps platoons rather than adding it to Imperial Army platoons, as it's not that under Legends, being separate from the Imperial Army. Weedle McHairybug (talk) 15:47, June 3, 2018 (UTC)

• Really?, weird!, but thanks. I didn't know that. One more thing. I have to admit that I didn't realized that you counter-edited the first or second time. Goodbye and have nice day. RC-0407 ()

Thank you for contributing to Wookieepedia! Please note that at least one of your recent additions added unverified information to a mainspace article. Additions to Wookieepedia's articles must be verifiable by a reliable source per our sourcing policy, and unverified information may be reverted or deleted. Continuing to add unverified information may lead to you being blocked from editing by an administrator. Thank you. You have been warned about this before. Please don't let it come to a block. Tommy Macaroni 16:56, June 12, 2018 (UTC)

• I shall take a look ad it. RC-0407 ()

We don't need to have a page for Imperial weapons, its effectively a list and we don't have lists for those kind of things. Its better to add on the individual weapon page if its used by the Empire --Lewisr (talk) 15:37, June 20, 2018 (UTC)

• The article is also primarily a chart, which we don't do here, and making a category page is not really ideal given that the weapons are not exclusive to the Empire and eventually we'll end up with a huge list of categories under each weapon.--Vitus Infinitus 16:04, June 20, 2018 (UTC)

Please do not remove content and replace it with a list. Wookieepedia discourages the use of lists, and prose should be used wherever possible. - Sir Cavalier of One 17:34, June 20, 2018 (UTC)

Hello RC. I was wondering what source uses the term "", because me and several other users can't find any mention of it. If it turns out the name is made up, the article will have to be deleted due to our notability policy, because it has a name in Legends. Thank you. Tommy Macaroni 16:43, June 23, 2018 (UTC)

• I dont remember. But I do know that deleting an whole page is a little over the top. Change the name, if you can't find the source. Most people add the word if they can't find the name. This was written at 09:51 in the morning. Date:24/6 Year:2018

Can you please tell us where in the Solo guide this information can be found? Thank you. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 19:05, July 27, 2018 (UTC)

• Allow me to add that the existence of your recent contributions involving both these Armored Divisions and the AT-series are contingent on you answering this question. If you don't respond, the information will be removed and you may face further sanctions in accordance with our Attribution policy. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 19:24, July 27, 2018 (UTC)

We refrain from making such lists because that's what the use of categories are for. You can see here when an administrator explained it to another user. Hope this answers your question.--Vitus Infinitus 19:00, August 15, 2018 (UTC)

• I'd recommend speaking to an admin then to clear it up then to make sure.--Vitus Infinitus 20:12, August 15, 2018 (UTC)

Hello! Yes I agree that both of those should be merged together --Lewisr (talk) 17:12, September 4, 2018 (UTC)

• To be honest you wouldn't need to merge 543rd Denbari Attack Company and 543th Denbari Attack Company as they essentially say the same thing already, you'd be best to just tag the wrong one for deletion. And for the other one you would simply need to just take the information off of one page and add it onto the other (making sure you don't copy over duplicate information), does that make sense? If not feel free to say --Lewisr (talk) 19:54, September 4, 2018 (UTC)

Hi RC-0407! Just to let you know that I have redirected your new page "AT-AT Platoon" to Armor platoon. Both the Imperial Sourcebook and Star Wars: Imperial Handbook: A Commander's Guide make it clear that this is the proper name for a formation of AT-ATs. - Sir Cavalier of One 20:10, September 19, 2018 (UTC)

Hello, one of those is the individual named AT-ATs we see and the other is for the different variants of AT-AT so merging the categories wouldn't be really the best thing to do, hope this helps --Lewisr (talk) 13:54, January 15, 2019 (UTC)

You uploaded an image called , but you added it to the AT-ST and AT-MP. Which one is it? Is the file name wrong? Is there an AT-DT?--DarthRuiz30 (talk) 20:26, July 18, 2019 (UTC)

Hey! Thanks for letting me know, I will take a look at it in a little while but thanks for bringing it to attention --Lewisr (talk) 18:50, August 31, 2020 (UTC)

Hello! Do you know User:73.40.63.96? Just curious after your edit on my talk page --Lewisr (talk) 17:14, September 9, 2020 (UTC)

Just as an FYI, you have a broken ref on your user page that is showing up in an error category. If you do a search for "Cite error" on the page, you should find it. -- Sulfur (talk) 13:33, 13 December 2020 (UTC)

Please list categories in alphabetical order. UberSoldat93 (talk) 16:23, 25 May 2021 (UTC)

Hey, there! I agree that Category:Imperial Sector Fleets should be listed under Category:Imperial Navy fleets, but not Category:Imperial Navy organizational fleets since that is different. The organizational fleets category is for types of formations, not actual units themselves. That's why I've added it to Category:Imperial Navy and Category:Organizational military units, similar to how the Category:Imperial Army categories are organized. I'll go ahead and add Sector Fleets if they haven't been added already, thanks! --Vitus Infinitus 17:21, 26 May 2021 (UTC)

Hey, RC-0407, I was wondering where you found the Cold Weather AT-MP Mark III in Star Wars: Commander? I can't find any trace of it in the game, thank you. --Vitus Infinitus 19:54, 3 August 2021 (UTC)

• I see thank you so much! It looks like that is actually the Cold Weather AT-MP Mark III and not the . --Vitus Infinitus 20:56, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
• I can't believe I asked for the wrong thing! I meant the , not the Cold Weather AT-MP Mark III --Vitus Infinitus 20:56, 3 August 2021 (UTC)