Has anyone been able to spot Cargo Pad 119-Gamma in the video titled Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order — Official Gameplay Reveal Live Stream — EA Play 2019, which is hosted on the official Electronic Arts Star Wars YouTube channel (here's a [backup link])? After watching it four separate times, I'm still unable to locate it. GeneralGrievous7 (talk) 13:46, July 19, 2019 (UTC)
I understand that the inclusion of TIE Interceptors and Imperial Star Destroyer IIs in the game was likely a decision made to conserve resources and time. However, the Jedi Fallen Order comic depicts Inquisitors using a TIE Interceptor, even though the TIE Interceptor wasn't introduced until three years before the Battle of Yavin, and the Imperial Star Destroyer II five years before Yavin. Therefore, even if the reason is purely practical, it still constitutes a continuity error based on the TIE Fighter Owner's Manual and other sources. I believe this should be noted in the continuity section. —Unsigned comment by RoninJedi37 (talk • contribs).
There seems to be some disagreement between myself and others about whether we need articles for characters like Nightbrother warriors and Purge Trooper Commanders. I am personally against it, as it goes against our established practice for basic game mechanics. There is really nothing more to add. Nightbrother archers are simply Nightbrothers equipped with bows. Purge Trooper Commanders are exactly what their name suggests, nothing more. They may have databank entries in the game, but they are not distinct in any significant way besides the weapons they wield. If we create articles for these, then I don't see why we shouldn't also have articles for Electrobaton Purge Troopers or Electrostaff Purge Troopers. Winterz (talk) 21:26, November 25, 2019 (UTC)
- While I acknowledge the distinctions you're drawing, I'm struggling to understand how the Purge Trooper Commander differs from, for example, the Stormtrooper Commander . Reddyredcp ( talk ) 21:35, November 25, 2019 (UTC) Stormtrooper commanders have been referenced in various sources, justifying a dedicated article. We should be able to differentiate between game mechanics without issue. The databank entries for the enemies I mentioned (e.g., Nightbrother warriors and Nightbrother archers) only differ in terms of how to defeat them in the game. Winterz (talk) 21:46, November 25, 2019 (UTC)
- I completely agree with Winterz's assessment. Creating articles for these NPC types would be akin to creating articles for each of Cal's Force powers. They are purely game mechanics and nothing else. - Cwedin (talk) 22:45, November 25, 2019 (UTC) Cal's force powers do have pages actually. - Red Duel 22:51, November 25, 2019 (UTC) I was referring to the powers on the game's skill tree. - Cwedin(talk) 22:53, November 25, 2019 (UTC) That's not the same thing, because these are specifically named units, not just upgraded abilities. - Red Duel 23:06, November 25, 2019 (UTC) The in-game databank entries for these NPCs only detail their strengths and weaknesses. It's all about game mechanics. There's nothing unique about "Nightbrother archers" or "Purge Trooper Commanders" beyond that. Imagine if we added articles for all 26,000 NPCs from SWTOR simply because they have "names." A simple way to illustrate this would be: imagine you were creating the article and tell me what you would write in it. Winterz (talk) 23:16, November 25, 2019 (UTC) Personally, I'm aiming for a middle ground. We should keep the Purge Trooper Commander and Scout Trooper Commander articles, but not the others, as commanders lead troops in battle and maintain morale, which is noteworthy, while the others simply use different weapons. I've expanded the Purge Trooper page with weapon additions, and someone else will work on the Nightbrother page. Kind regards Darth Tomotron (talk) 01:09, November 26, 2019 (UTC) The section that identifies these NPCs is not even the databank; it's the "Tactical Guide," which is for in-game mechanics--DarthRuiz30 (talk) 07:05, November 26, 2019 (UTC) A Sandtrooper Commander page was just created. I don't play Galaxy of Heroes, so I'm unsure how it compares to a Scout Trooper Commander or Purge Trooper Commander --Lewisr (talk) 11:39, November 26, 2019 (UTC) In response to Tomotron, I've noticed that Purge Trooper Commanders (identified by their red pauldrons) appear in other sources, and I agree that they merit an article. As for Scout Trooper Commanders, someone seems to believe that other sources mention them, so I can't comment without more information. Regarding the Nightbrothers, I remain strongly opposed to creating articles for warriors or archers. If you disagree, it would be best to create the article and then bring the matter to the community for a consensus in the Wookieepedia:Trash compactor. Winterz (talk) 04:35, November 27, 2019 (UTC)
Given the order presented on the wikia, shouldn't it be stated that the Mantis visited Dathomir a total of three times, rather than just two? Rgilbert27 (talk) 19:49, November 26, 2019 (UTC)
- The visit to Dathomir before Kashyyyk is optional for the player. If you only follow the game's main objectives, you will only visit it two times. - Cwedin (talk) 19:55, November 26, 2019 (UTC) However, for the sake of continuity, it was still three visits, correct? Rgilbert27 (talk) 20:06, November 26, 2019 (UTC) As far I remember theres just two visits to Dathomir--DarthRuiz30 (talk) 07:57, November 27, 2019 (UTC) There's no narrative reason to visit Dathomir before Bogano, and both Cere and Greez will advise against it. Players who want to obtain the double-bladed lightsaber early may choose to do so, but canonically, there's no reason to assume that Cal would have done so. - Approved Trash (talk) 18:22, November 28, 2019 (UTC) The order is Bogano, Zeffo, Dathomir, then Kashyyyk. Rgilbert27 (talk) 08:25, December 3, 2019 (UTC) The game's quest log indicates that Dathomir was visited three times. The first visit occurs between the initial Zeffo visit and the initial Kashyyyk visit, during chapter two. It's not our role to justify narrative decisions (although it's reasonable to assume that visiting Dathomir is safer than Imperial-controlled Kashyyyk), but rather to document Star Wars canon. 07jonesj (talk) 01:05, December 9, 2019 (UTC) Is it possible for that entry to appear in the quest log even if you don't go to Dathomir between Zeffo and Kashyyyk?--DarthRuiz30 (talk) 01:54, December 9, 2019 (UTC) Yes I have it like that and I didn't go to Dathomir until after Kashyyyk --Lewisr (talk) 03:01, December 9, 2019 (UTC)
While I was on Kashyyyk, I made an observation. On my way back to my meditation point, I heard the Imperial officer's announcement refer to 119-Grek instead of 119-Gamma. Since this occurred in the same location, I believe that 119-Gamma should be changed to 119-Grek. —Unsigned comment by Leema Kai (talk • contribs). 11:30 May 21 2020 (UTC)
Where specifically in the game does it state that Order 66 took place five years prior to the events of the game? I'm not questioning the accuracy, but my initial search didn't yield any results. --Lelal Mekha (Audience Room) 07:49, June 19, 2020 (UTC)
- The date is derived from a conversation between Prauf and Cal Kestis in the Shipbreaking Yard : " This heap's been here for, what, four years? "; " [No.] Five. " - Cwedin (talk) 06:43, June 20, 2020 (UTC)