Talk: Rgilbert27

Hi, I appreciate you are trying to help, but some pages don't need a scroll box, just pages with enough sources/references/appearances deserve one. Also Layout guide says that the word right should be included in the pictures, so stop deleting that too. Thanks--DarthRuiz30 (talk) 01:24, July 25, 2017 (UTC)

If there's a char-stub on the page you don't need to then add an update template, the stub already says that the page needs updating, seems unnecessary to have both --Lewisr (talk) 14:13, August 1, 2017 (UTC)

Instead of posting the same message on the talk page of each bureaucrat, changes to the Layout Guide need to be voted on in the Consensus track. However, I doubt an amendment to remove the |right from thumbnails would be a success. Since its presence doesn't really affect the page negatively in any way, it makes more sense to keep it around for consistency and bot parsing. Cheers, 1358 (Talk) 19:20, August 6, 2017 (UTC)

• Consensus and policy dictates whether |right or not should be included; in this case, policy says it should be. Attempts to remove |right can be construed as disruption and may be met with administrative sanctions. Like I said, changes to policy can be proposed in the Consensus track. 1358(Talk) 19:47, August 6, 2017 (UTC)

You asked to the admins and two of them told you the same I did, stop removing the |right, if you want you can order the way is written, but attempts to remove the |right like the admin above said is disruption and may be met sanctions of them. You're welcome to address it on the Senate Hall or the CT--DarthRuiz30 (talk) 01:00, August 7, 2017 (UTC)

• I'm not sure why you insist on still removing it when you've been warned against doing so, please stop --Lewisr (talk) 01:24, August 24, 2017 (UTC)

I do get it, the policy says that it stays so there's no reason to remove it, if you really feel that strongly then start a CT vote as has been suggested to you previously --Lewisr (talk) 01:31, August 24, 2017 (UTC)

• I don't really know how you start one as I've never done it myself, ask an admin or someone who has made one in the past and they'll help you --Lewisr (talk) 01:41, August 24, 2017 (UTC)

Hey, I saw that your CT was deleted. If you decide to create another, write the problem how the "|right" makes no difference, then propose what the policy would be after the change. Then for people to vote add 3 sections: Agree, Disagree and comments. Good luck with it--DarthRuiz30 (talk) 00:42, September 11, 2017 (UTC)

I've reverted your edits to the Executor/Legends article since they violate our Layout Guide. Please familiarize yourself with that and other policies before making any further edits, and, since the Executor is a Featured Article, one of the very best our site has to offer, please communicate with the article's nominator about making any changes to it. Thank you. Imperators II 15:43, September 13, 2017 (UTC)

You have been blocked from contributing for 1 week for persistent edit warring, a violation of Wookieepedia's Three-revert rule. To contest this block, please contact the blocking administrator with the reason you believe the block is unjustified. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 17:48, September 13, 2017 (UTC)

I know you've been fighting to remove the |right, but please the policy is still the same, if you're going to move images, add the |right. Thanks--DarthRuiz30 (talk) 00:41, October 3, 2017 (UTC)

What do you mean? --Lewisr (talk) 15:27, December 24, 2017 (UTC)

• My only suggestion would be to remove the image --Lewisr (talk) 15:31, December 24, 2017 (UTC)

I like, when the different things are separated like issue 1-9 are under "0#", issues 10-19 under "1#". When you put that space between the | and the number, the little titles like "here's everting under 0" don't show up. I find it harder finding things that way.--ZapikCZ (talk) 16:56, January 24, 2018 (UTC)

• Here are a few examples from the past that are neither like how the canon ones were before nor how you made them, so I don't understand why you did it like you did. Category:Star Wars: Republic, Category:Star Wars: Empire, [[:Category:Star Wars: Rebellion]], [[:Category:Star Wars: Knights of the Old Republic (comics)]].

Special issues like Destroyer Down, Annual, Ashcan shouldn't be numbered. I get you're trying to numerize them, but they are not part of the main numbering--DarthRuiz30 (talk) 02:19, January 26, 2018 (UTC)

• Besides numbered issues, we shouldn't numbered other issues like Annuals I see you did the same for other series. In my opinion also TPBs and comic arcs shouldn't be numbered too like you did for Darth Vader 2015 series, but the special issues like annuals, one-shots or any other "special" issue should be kept without a number on the category--DarthRuiz30 (talk) 02:37, January 26, 2018 (UTC)

Hello. I'd like to know why are you insisting on changing filenames, as you did here, even after specifically being told that they should be written with underscores instead of dashes. 06:30, February 5, 2018 (UTC)

• Again, stop doing this, please. Thank you. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 17:36, April 29, 2018 (UTC)

Categories should be based in alphabetical ordering. Sorting comic issues by arbitrary numbers allows you to see the publication order, but that's not what categories are for, and doing so makes the page more difficult to navigate. For example, if someone was looking for Poe Dameron Annual 1, they would have to look between issues 15 and 16, which doesn't make sense, since it should logically be under a subheading of A. If someone was looking for publication info, they would go to the actual page of the comic, not the category. - Cwedin 17:59, February 9, 2018 (UTC)

• I don't know what the categories looked like before, but they still need to be cleaned up, in my opinion. Ideally, the articles on individual issues should have something like [[Category:whatever|24]], with no space before the issue number. The series pages should have a space with no number, and TPBs should be sorted by volume or something. This would also be easier for maintaining articles of ongoing series; e.g. Poe Dameron Volume 1 is currently listed as "35," which would need to be changed to "36" if a 27th comic issue was announced. - Cwedin 18:49, February 9, 2018 (UTC)

Hi. I'd like to know what are you talking about here. I've checked your and previous revision in Oasis, Monobook, and Mercury, and it doesn't "clash" with infobox or anything in either of those skins. In fact, it doesn't appear to be doing anything at all. Imperators II 16:58, February 11, 2018 (UTC)

• I'm talking about the possible [[Help:Skins|skins]] in which you are viewing Wookieepedia content, either the default "Wikia"/"Oasis" skin, the Monobook skin, or the Mercury skin which is used on mobile by default. Look, can you just link to a screenshot of this] revision of the article so that I can see what you're talking about when referring to "clashing with the infobox"? Thanks, Imperators II 17:08, February 11, 2018 (UTC)

Please, remember to use the summary edit only for constructive comments, the "deal with it" attitude isn't appropiate be careful with your words next time--DarthRuiz30 (talk) 05:16, February 18, 2018 (UTC)

• Doesn't matter, you always need to address your objections properly without having a bad attitude against anyone. Now respecting the legends comics we're going to get to them eventually.--DarthRuiz30 (talk) 06:28, February 18, 2018 (UTC)

Not sure why you're removing the |right from images when you've been told before that it can be construed as disruption. Please stop doing this --Lewisr (talk) 19:03, March 23, 2018 (UTC)

• Again, you need to add it not removing it.--DarthRuiz30 (talk) 21:19, March 24, 2018 (UTC)

Of course mistakes will go unnoticed we're not here 24/7, but once we find the problem it will be most likely fixed. As for the One Piece wikia, I'm not interested in One Piece never seen it before and not too interested in watching it and if I'm going to spend time doing something I prefer is something that I like.--DarthRuiz30 (talk) 06:07, March 25, 2018 (UTC)

Hey, Jordo (commander) is to be moved to Jordo, so in advance all links must point to the latter page. Tommy Macaroni 09:24, April 13, 2018 (UTC)

• That's just the way things are done, please stop changing it. 09:27, April 13, 2018 (UTC)

Hey, I just wanted to let you know that, per Wookieepedia:Layout Guide#Images, "Image caption punctuation (i.e., a full stop, or period) is determined by whether the caption uses a complete sentence. Example: "Luke Skywalker, Jedi Knight" does not receive a full stop, whereas "Luke Skywalker was a Jedi Knight." does." I was a bit confused by this at first, but it does make sense. For some more examples, from you recent edits, "Sloane defeated Count Vidian with the help of her rebel foes Hera and Kanan." should have a period/full stop as it is a full sentence, which you rightly added. However, "Sloane's first face-to-face meeting with Jarrus" doesn't need one, as it isn't a full sentence, as the caption makes no sense without the image. I hope this helps. Tommy Macaroni 17:13, April 19, 2018 (UTC)

• Please pay attention to this, because right now you're just adding punctuation to all captions when in most cases it isn't necessary. 16:16, April 20, 2018 (UTC)

Please stop making unnecessary categories, we don't need categories for issues within comic series, especially for a 6 issue run --Lewisr (talk) 19:34, May 2, 2018 (UTC)

You should have "Category:Canon trade paperbacks" and "Category:Legends trade paperbacks" as the correct category names instead of having "Category:Canon Trade paperbacks" and "Category:Legends Trade paperbacks" respectively. --Rakhsh (talk) 15:57, May 3, 2018 (UTC)

Jedi temple is refered to the several temples through the galaxy, Jedi Temple is Coruscant's temple and its always capitalized. Titles before a name should be capitalized just like Lord, Chief Librarian, Jedi Master, Master, etc.--DarthRuiz30 (talk) 08:30, May 6, 2018 (UTC)

Please stop the aggressive behavior, always make your points in a civil way. If you want a page to be create it, then you can do it, instead of ordering user to do them for you--DarthRuiz30 (talk) 21:20, May 9, 2018 (UTC)

• That's not a reason to order users to make them. Everyone here is because they want all of us are volunteers and that's the main reason why there's not a priority list to what should be created first, people edit what they like, should we have the article yes, is it going to be created eventually. If you have questions about how to create a page ask other users, for example go to any book series and click edit thay way you can see how the page is structured. Also in the help section you can read the Manual of Style and Layout guide to learn more about the article creation process--DarthRuiz30 (talk) 21:48, May 9, 2018 (UTC)
• Unless you're going to do some about the page not existing then don't keep adding it, its better to link to a page that actually exists as it still helps readers with access to the main series --Lewisr (talk) 21:25, May 9, 2018 (UTC)

Please note that while advisory templates are not necessarily strictly subject to this rule, the Layout Guide specifies that appearance lists will list comic stories by individual issue and not by arc. -- Darth Culator 02:51, May 10, 2018 (UTC)

• "Seen it before" versus "in the layout guide." Guess which one wins? -- Darth Culator 23:13, May 10, 2018 (UTC)

You did a pretty good job with it. Just an advice when copy-pasting be sure to remove all references from the previous article and add the references for the actual book you're creating, same goes for Bibliography. As for help creating more articles, I wouldn't expect help immediately, but I'm sure that they will be created soon. I'll try and see if tomorrow I can get a couple of them--DarthRuiz30 (talk) 07:05, May 13, 2018 (UTC)

Please stop removing spaces between the notes and references and the categories for no reason --Lewisr (talk) 14:18, May 16, 2018 (UTC)

• Really? So what about this? And this? And the other occasions? --Lewisr (talk) 14:23, May 16, 2018 (UTC)

Please respect {{Inuse}} tags at the top of articles. This includes simple maintenance edits like this one. Thank you. 1358 (Talk) 22:07, May 20, 2018 (UTC)

Again stop removing the |right from the images, you've been warned about this several times.--DarthRuiz30 (talk) 22:49, July 27, 2018 (UTC)

• It doesn't matter if there was or not a |right, if the order of the images has changed, you need to add them. Just because some other pages doesn't have the "|right" in all their images, it doesn't mean its the way to do it. You've been trying to use that reasoning for other issues, and as another comment in your talk page says "Seen it before versus in the layout guide. Guess which one wins?". Eventually other pages will be changed and will follow what the Layout guide says.--DarthRuiz30 (talk) 23:56, July 27, 2018 (UTC)

If you don't even know what it is, then don't revert it or modify it. Oasis is default wikia skin, in it the infobox do not clashes. All edits should be done with Oasis skin in mind. I will remove your float, and please do not re-introduce. If you don't know something google it or ask properly, instead of reverting --DarthRuiz30 (talk) 03:59, August 24, 2018 (UTC)

• Oasis is the default skin seen by , if you're using another skin then that's up to you, but all will be formatted according the oasis/wikia skin. You'll be breaking the 3RR rule--DarthRuiz30 (talk) 04:19, August 24, 2018 (UTC)

You've been told since August 6, 2017. Stop removing |right. You're removing it from Anakin Skywalker/Legends article and in this case many of them had the |right. Removing |right is considered a disruptive behavior since its part of the policy to introduce that term and as an Admin told you since last year it could lead you to a block--DarthRuiz30 (talk) 08:46, September 6, 2018 (UTC)

• Then follow the policy and reintroduce the parameter you deliberately deleted when changed from left to right--DarthRuiz30 (talk) 08:52, September 6, 2018 (UTC)

Please if you don't know how the template works, then just don't revert/remove. Yes, the text its highlighted by the apostrophes, but that's how the template is formatted and as you can see in the article the entire text is unaffected. If you find something like this, please check out first the templete page instead of just removing. See {{Spoiler}} for more information, there's even an example there.--DarthRuiz30 (talk) 09:59, September 8, 2018 (UTC)

In the future, please pay respect to the {{Inuse}} template placed at the top of articles, such as Zygerrian/Legends. It signifies that another user is actively working on an article. You made an edit at the same time as I was trying to do one as well, causing an edit conflict and forcing me to re-do a large chunk of work from scratch. Thank you. 20:41, September 8, 2018 (UTC)

You have been blocked from contributing for 1 month for edit warring. While edit warring is typically our least serious offense, I am taking into account multiple factors when issuing you this block length, including: 1) This is your second block in the last year for edit warring; 2) Since that initial block, you have been directly warned twice for subsequent edit-warring offenses; 3) Your talk page is littered with one notice or warning after another for disruptive practices, the most prominent being your infatuation with messing with image alignment. It's clear you haven't taken the hint yet, so perhaps this month-long timeout will help you figure it out. To contest this block, please contact the blocking administrator with the reason you believe the block is unjustified. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 19:13, September 14, 2018 (UTC)

• You may contact me via our official IRC channel. And please don't use another wiki to message me again. I will not respond to any further off-site messages. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 20:53, September 14, 2018 (UTC)

Hi Rgilbert27,

I just wanted to notify you that I will be seeing if I could make an interview to Mr. Timothy Zahn. I have yet to ask him via his Facebook account if he will accept, but I'm sure he will want to share his time with us. Back to the matter, I just wanted to ask you if you would like to ask him some question so I can ask it to him during the interview.

Thanks!

So, I looked at [[Darth Vader's conspiracy]]. I don't know too much about the subject, but at a glance there were two things that stood out:

• First, given what little information there is, the "campaign" infobox doesn't seem like the right one. Again, I don't know that much about the topic, so I could be wrong, but it doesn't seem like a good fit.
• Second, the list of battles seems a bit long, especially compared to the relative brevity of the Appearances list. Is there a reason for that?

That' everything I've got. Good luck with your editing. SilverSunbird (talk) 01:04, November 11, 2018 (UTC)

We should not be taking the option to search use the TOC function away from those who choose to use the classic category view and force upon them the need to switch to another view simply to use it. If they use the classic view, then they should be able to use the functionality. Removing it removes choice. - Sir Cavalier of One 12:27, November 26, 2018 (UTC)

If things are done a certain way then there's obviously a reason why it was done that way, changing it is why your edits are being reverted --Lewisr (talk) 22:27, December 11, 2018 (UTC)

• I know it usually goes that way, but on some occasions its best for the article to do things otherwise --Lewisr (talk) 22:32, December 11, 2018 (UTC)

Hello. Please stop left-aligning the image on the Enaleh article. While, yes, left-to-right is the general guideline for image placement, it is acceptable to deviate from that guideline in cases such as this, where left-aligning the image would cause it to indent the following section header, which is undesirable for aesthetic purposes.

And may I remind you, you have been blocked twice already, not to mention warned repeatedly, for edit-warring and disruptive edits regarding image placement. Please do learn from these past experiences and do not continue to engage in such practices. Thank you, Imperators II 22:39, January 3, 2019 (UTC)

• Please read this and stop arguing the toss every time, sometimes its okay to do things differently if the situation calls for it. --Lewisr (talk) 19:42, February 3, 2019 (UTC)

When adding images, please add captions as well, rather than leaving it for someone else to do. Thanks. Supreme Emperor (talk) 23:50, January 6, 2019 (UTC)

• I would politely ask you to watch your tone. Please keep in mind other users are not responsible for cleaning up someone else's edits. Thank you for your understanding. Supreme Emperor (talk) 00:07, January 7, 2019 (UTC)

Stop adding them, yes there's some names on the internet for the upcoming Resistance episodes, but they haven't been released by Disney press release on their website. Doesn't matter what Wikipedia says, until some weeks ago they had that Adam Driver was going to appear based on a rumor. So saying "Wikipedia has them" isn't correct--DarthRuiz30 (talk) 03:01, January 16, 2019 (UTC)

Hey Rgilber27,

Sorry for replying too late, but I'm willing to help you to convince Wookieepedia's admins to restore the page. Just post your proposal on the Senate Hall forum and then I will have an argument to post there. But when you post the proposal, be sure of listing all the sources and info you have recovered ;)

Regards,

--X9 The Android (talk) 18:12, January 17, 2019 (UTC)

Okay but you really need to stop altering stuff on status article pages, if its done a certain way then obviously there is a reason as to why it is, so don't then go and change it. As has been said multiple times now to you, its okay to go away from left-right if the situation calls for it. This is literally the last time I'm gonna say this to you so make sure you don't do it again --Lewisr (talk) 04:08, February 6, 2019 (UTC)

Please take the time to look over Wookieepedia:Civility, in regards to Talk:Star Wars Resistance Season One. "Someone should eat some humble pie" offers nothing to the conversation and just aggravates other users. Try to be more understanding of other people's opinions and comment on content, not on the contributor. If you continue to act in this manner, while also taking into account your previous edit-warring, it isn't unreasonable to expect another block. Considering this would be your third, six months to a year would not be unreasonable. I would consider this your final warning. Thank you for your cooperation. Tommy Macaroni 21:14, February 22, 2019 (UTC)

• The issue is still being discussed, which is how I saw your message. I'm not telling you off or anything for the comment, just trying to ensure it does not happen again. 21:21, February 22, 2019 (UTC)

Hey Rgilbert, would you mind explaining to me what's going on here? From what I can tell, SAMAS made some edits a week ago, and in the time since then you've been reverting him, and then yourself; removing and then readding his info. And now you've asked someone to do... something. There is nothing sarcastic or rhetorical when I ask you to explain what's going on because I'm genuinely confused. Thanks, Tommy Macaroni 19:59, March 4, 2019 (UTC)

• Okay, so why did your most recent edit reintroduce the aforementioned grammar error? 20:16, March 4, 2019 (UTC)

• I'm giving you a general notice to slow down and watch what you say and do in regards to this latest spat you've gotten yourself involved in. The edit-war warning you issued to Ruiz was uncalled for; rather, it is you who have reverted three times and are close to violating that rule, something you have a particular penchant for and which you have been blocked for previously. If you continue to escalate this situation, a cool-down block won't be out of the question. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 22:42, March 20, 2019 (UTC)

Don't worry ;)----X9 The Android (talk) 20:45, April 14, 2019 (UTC)

While all good-faith contributions to Wookieepedia are appreciated, we ask that you please refer to Wookieepedia:Images, which can be found under the "other policies and guidelines" link in your welcome message, and familiarize yourself with the sourcing and licensing requirements before uploading any more images. The only uploading method supported by Wookieepedia, Special:Upload, will prompt you to enter this information. Wikia's non-standard upload forms are not supported under Wookieepedia policy, and ignorance of the uploading rules is not an acceptable excuse. Continued violation of the image policy or falsification of any information in an upload description are considered vandalism and will likely result in a block. Thank you. 1358 (Talk) 15:26, May 1, 2019 (UTC)

• The Upload page has excellent instructions on what you need to do. You can also take a look at other files and see how they are formatted. 1358(Talk) 15:41, May 1, 2019 (UTC)

Please, at least add the correct author and artist for the comics--DarthRuiz30 (talk) 06:34, June 15, 2019 (UTC)

• Regardless of those covers, for this they don't matter, you've been here pretty long to know that you need to add the correct information to the articles you create--DarthRuiz30 (talk) 07:06, June 15, 2019 (UTC)

Use {{SWKidsYoutube}} instead of {{YouTube}}--DarthRuiz30 (talk) 18:59, June 19, 2019 (UTC)

• There's a reason of why I'm telling you now. --DarthRuiz30 (talk) 19:12, June 19, 2019 (UTC)

Please make sure you list sources in the order they are published --Lewisr (talk) 02:49, June 20, 2019 (UTC)

• Fair enough, I mean I was really just putting them in the right order --Lewisr (talk) 03:05, June 20, 2019 (UTC)

hi

Hi, an advice. Try to add the imagecat below the collections section of the comics. That's usually where's is placed and it looks better than at the beginning of the article since its not that intrusive with the cover gallery or the scroll box gallery in some cases. Thanks--DarthRuiz30 (talk) 01:22, July 2, 2019 (UTC)

• Hey relax, as I said its an advice. Don't take every comment as an attack to yourself. Its fine most of the times they don't affect the page, but its better for you to know about it, and try to improve the quality of the article. As I said, that the place where its usually placed and its the less intrusive place where they don't tend to affect any other section.--DarthRuiz30 (talk) 01:48, July 2, 2019 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for 3 months. I warned you last time I talked to you about civility that that was your last warning, and I am honouring that. Your attitude to other users you interact with is unacceptable, as you have been told multiple times before now. You are condescending and hostile to others even when they attempt to help you, and previously you have made comments you knew would aggravate other users. Due to this, as well as the plethora of other warnings on your talk page, and your previous two blocks, I have decided to give you 3 months. I hope you reconsider your approach before your return, as you are a valuable editor, but currently your attitude to others is a detriment to the site. To contest this block, please contact the blocking administrator with the reason you believe the block is unjustified. Tommy Macaroni 07:43, July 4, 2019 (UTC)

Please do not add spoiler tags to pages that have no relevance to Jedi Fallen Order like you did with Hunt for Jocasta Nu, why would that even need a spoiler tag? You only add the tag if there is information from said piece of media on that page, so if there is no information from Fallen Order on that page, do not add a Fallen Order spoiler tag --Lewisr (talk) 00:27, November 22, 2019 (UTC)

• Please read what the template says 'Warning! This page contains MAJOR spoilers from Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order. Caution is advised.' If the page does not contain any spoilers from Fallen Order (hence why it says 'This page'), it should not be added, regardless of whether the game includes any spoilers or not --Lewisr (talk) 00:39, November 22, 2019 (UTC)

Per the [[Template:Majorspoiler|Template usage section]], you need to add the '' after the name of the product. Thanks--DarthRuiz30 (talk) 20:45, November 26, 2019 (UTC)