Hello! Is there any supporting information to confirm that Faie is indeed the same individual as the Unidentified Advanced Recon Force Scout Trooper officer observed in Revenge of the Sith? I'm inquiring because the Faie article is currently designated as a Good article; therefore, any additions must be both verifiable and accurate. Thanks! Lewisr (talk) 04:05, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
- My understanding is that it simply depicts what Faie commanded, rather than explicitly stating that the character depicted is Faie Lewisr ( talk ) 03:08, 29 March 2024 (UTC). The presence of a clone officer in the film does not automatically equate to that character being Faie; it could be any other clone officer. Before we can definitively state that it is Faie, we require an additional source that specifically identifies the character as such Lewisr (talk) 04:02, 29 March 2024 (UTC) I appreciate your comprehension! For the time being, we must indeed wait. It's possible that at some point, a connection may be established between Faie and this character, but we will have to be patient and see what develops Lewisr (talk) 04:37, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Hello! Should you possess a credible source indicating that Echo is no longer considered an ARC commando within Clone Force 99, you are welcome to reinstate that information within the article. I hope this clarifies the situation, Anıl Şerifoğlu (talk) 17:20, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
- Indeed, the article continues to acknowledge his prior status as an ARC trooper, citing the Databank entry as its source. I have only undone the additions that lacked sourcing, such as the "upgrade to a new clone commando armor." Anıl Şerifoğlu ( talk ) 00:13, 20 April 2024 (UTC). The article already details the formation of the Bad Batch in a previous section, so reiterating that information would be unnecessarily repetitive. Furthermore, I am unsure of your meaning when you say "automatically being a commando," etc. ARC trooper is an acronym for Advanced Recon Commando, a detail that is already included in the article. Anıl Şerifoğlu (talk) 22:22, 26 April 2024 (UTC) I apologize, but I am uncertain as to the issue at hand. The article already documents Echo's past as an ARC trooper and his subsequent membership in the Bad Batch, which is evident in both the written content and the assigned categories. Therefore, an additional commando category is superfluous here. Anıl Şerifoğlu (talk) As I mentioned, the page already provides a comprehensive account of his involvement with the Bad Batch, so it is not inaccurate. Anıl Şerifoğlu (talk) 00:23, 27 April 2024 (UTC) To reiterate, the page already includes Category:Members of Clone Force 99, which renders broader parent categories like Category:Galactic Republic individuals or Category:Clone troopers unnecessary. Please refrain from repeatedly reverting the edit. Anıl Şerifoğlu (talk) 00:55, 27 April 2024 (UTC) No problem! Anıl Şerifoğlu (talk) 02:22, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
It is not permissible to simply delete an existing article without any reasoning or create a duplicate page as a means of deleting the original. If you believe that an article warrants deletion, you must first utilize Forum:Trash compactor to gauge whether other Wookieepedians concur with your assessment. I hope this clarifies the situation, AnilSerifoglu (talk) 01:13, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
Hello! Unfortunately, I lack the necessary permissions to restore pages, as I am not an administrator. It would likely be more efficient to incorporate the information in question into the existing Genetically defective clone page, and then relocate that page if a new title is deemed necessary Lewisr (talk) 01:23, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
Hello, GormCyborg! I am writing to inform you that you must update your signature to reflect your current Fandom username in order to adhere to the site's signature policy. Happy editing, and best wishes! Bonzane10 black belt in card-jitsu 09:34, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
You have been barred from contributing for a duration of one week due to persistent general disruption despite receiving multiple warnings and in defiance of the ongoing TC discussion. Should you wish to challenge this block, please contact the administrator who issued it, providing the rationale for why you believe the block to be unwarranted. AnilSerifoglu (talk) 22:19, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
Hello, GormCyborg! I am writing to inform you that, for future reference, please utilize the move function when seeking to assign a new title to an existing article or page. This ensures that the edit history of the article is preserved. Specifically, I am referring to the name change you implemented for Category:Advanced Recon Force Scout Troopers. If you have any inquiries, please do not hesitate to ask. Happy editing, and best wishes! Bonzane10 15:31, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
Hello GormCyborg, this is difficult to say, but I will be direct. Your recent article on Clone ARC Commandos is simply... speculation. The concept art was mislabeled. There is no evidence to suggest it is its own unit Editoronthewiki (talk) 11:58, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
This categorization is not appropriate, as the article pertains to a technological device, whereas the category you added is intended for individuals. Please be mindful of this distinction when re-categorizing articles. Thank you. Xd1358 (Talk) 22:59, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
- I am intervening to state that, as an administrator, you should cease creating new categories or adding articles to existing categories for the time being. Many of the categories you have established are inaccurate or based on misinterpretations of the source material, and edits such as this only create additional work for other users. Cade Calrayn 23:36, 3 November 2024 (UTC) Once more, the category you are attempting to add is for individuals, while the article itself does not concern an individual. Xd1358 (Talk) 17:39, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
Hello! Please be advised that Lex is currently undergoing review here, and therefore removing it from the page as you did here is not appropriate at this time. If you have addressed any of the concerns raised on the review page, you are welcome to respond and inform us. The review will be removed once all issues have been resolved. Thank you! Lewisr (talk) 23:06, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
Hello there, GormCyborg. I would like to inform you that we still lack a reliable source confirming the recanonization of Fordo. The statue produced by Gentle Giant is insufficient to establish the character's existence within canon, as products based on Legends are not uncommon. Happy editing, and best wishes! Bonzane10 02:26, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Greetings again. I would like to clarify that there is a distinction between Fordo and Faie, as the latter has been referenced in multiple official canon sources. Fordo, however, has only appeared in the Gentle Giant statue, making the addition of a canon counterpart based solely on that speculative. As another example, Gentle Giant produced a bust of Galen Marek, but that alone was not, and should not be, the sole basis for considering him canon. If you have any further questions, feel free to respond on my talk page or join Wook's Discord server. Happy editing, and best wishes! Bonzane10 04:30, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
Hi Gorm, I see that you created the canon page for Tendau Bendon, and I was hoping you could direct me to the section of the senators Encyclopedia that mentions the character, as I'd like to expand the page. Ayrehead02 (talk) 10:44, 13 January 2025 (UTC)
- Never mind, I managed to find it on a second look immediately after sending this message. Ayrehead02 ( talk ) 10:48, 13 January 2025 (UTC)