Thank you for contributing to Wookieepedia! Please note that at least one of your recent additions added unverified information to a mainspace article. Additions to Wookieepedia's articles must be verifiable by a reliable source per our sourcing policy, and unverified information may be reverted or deleted. Continuing to add unverified information may lead to you being blocked from editing by an administrator. Thank you. --DarthRuiz30 (talk) 06:02, November 6, 2018 (UTC)
Thank you for contributing to Wookieepedia! Please note that at least one of your recent additions added unverified information to a mainspace article. Additions to Wookieepedia's articles must be verifiable by a reliable source per our sourcing policy, and unverified information may be reverted or deleted. Continuing to add unverified information may lead to you being blocked from editing by an administrator. Thank you. --DarthRuiz30 (talk) 05:38, October 25, 2019 (UTC)
Talk:Ahsoka Tano#Why listed as dead?--DarthRuiz30 (talk) 22:17, December 20, 2019 (UTC)
While all good-faith contributions to Wookieepedia are appreciated, we ask that you please refer to Wookieepedia:Images and familiarize yourself with the sourcing and licensing requirements before uploading any more images. The only uploading method supported by Wookieepedia, Special:Upload, will prompt you to enter this information. Continued violation of the image policy or falsification of any information in an upload description are considered vandalism and will likely result in a block. Thank you. --DarthRuiz30 (talk) 09:44, December 23, 2019 (UTC)
Do not remove information only because you believe is speculation, especially if users are disputing the claim. If people claim is Death Watch, but you think they're not and there's a discussion about it, you should not remove the information until there's a concensus. --DarthRuiz30 (talk) 06:42, January 4, 2020 (UTC)
I don't see any edit war, but there seems to be a disagreement between you and another user. I recommend you to leave the user a message about why you disagree with the edits, instead of just reverting.--DarthRuiz30 (talk) 05:56, January 24, 2020 (UTC)
Stop changing the dates of the TOR: Onslaught's events. There's a reasoning behind it and you should argue it first before changing. Just present your argument in this forum: Forum:SH:The Old Republic: Dates. Winterz (talk) 14:30, January 31, 2020 (UTC)
- I'll just respond with a copy & paste directly from Wookieepedia: "According to Star Wars: The Old Republic's lead designer Charles Boyd, the events depicted in post-launch Game Updates can be assumed to occur in a timeline matching that of their real-time release. Therefore, the later chapters of the Digital Expansion Star Wars: The Old Republic: Knights of the Fallen Empire occur in 3631 BBY. Boyd also confirmed that the sequel, Star Wars: The Old Republic: Knights of the Eternal Throne, is set six to eight months after the end of Fallen Empire, so the events of Eternal Throne can be placed in approximately 3630 BBY. According to Scourge and Kira Carsen, it has been a year since they destroyed Vitiate's original body, which they say happened concurrently with the Battle of Zakuul. The Battle of Zakuul takes place during Knights of the Eternal Throne, which was confirmed to happen in 3630 BBY, meaning that the events of Star Wars: The Old Republic: Onslaught, which includes the appearance of this article's subject, can be dated to 3629 BBY." --Potsk () 18:27, January 31, 2020 (UTC)
Will you stop removing the Sith and Sith Academy affiliations? It is not necessary and certainly NOT redundant. Sith individuals are affiliated with the Sith Order; not everyone in the Sith Empire are Sith, many are Imperials or just associated with it like House Thul; and there are Sith who never went to the Sith Academy. Darth Nox and anyone else who attended the Sith Academy are affiliated to it. Andrewh7 (talk) 23:22, February 4, 2020 (UTC) Andrewh7
Many of the spellings for the pages of the show come from subtitles. UberSoldat93 (talk) 17:45, February 10, 2020 (UTC)
- Yes, but this one is an obvious error. If the subtitles misspelled Din Djarin's name as "Fin", would you insist on naming the page Fin Djarin? --Potsk () 17:47, February 10, 2020 (UTC)
I got that it was published with a limited release. But here on Wookieepedia, info is posted upon the official release. Same with the films. The info is posted once the film is released in all zones of the USA even if it's prematurely released in other countries. I didn't invent such rule. It's a protocol here. ---- X9 The Android (talk) 23:13, March 6, 2020 (UTC)
Do not post information from The Rise of Skywalker novelization until the official release date. Doesn't matter if it was released in advance in a convention--DarthRuiz30 (talk) 23:13, March 6, 2020 (UTC)
How is adding a category for Dark Lords of the Sith of resurgent Sith Empire and changing Sith Lord to Dark Lord of the Sith speculation, unverified and unnecessary if they have Darth in their names / titles. Only Dark Lords of the Sith have Darth as a title. Andrewh7 (talk) 03:14, March 20, 2020 (UTC) Andrewh7
Darth Nox had purple eyes other than Force walk like when they used Force lightning to retrieve the holocron on Korriban. The change from Yellow/Orange/Red to Yellow, orange or red is highly unnecessary. There was absolutely nothing wrong with it and was fine to begin with. Andrewh7 (talk) 17:24, April 1, 2020 (UTC) Andrewh7
Thank you for contributing to Wookieepedia! Please note that at least one of your recent additions added unverified information to a mainspace article. Additions to Wookieepedia's articles must be verifiable by a reliable source per our sourcing policy, and unverified information may be reverted or deleted. Continuing to add unverified information may lead to you being blocked from editing by an administrator. Thank you. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 17:31, September 12, 2020 (UTC)
And where is it stated that the Empire's Wrath had the title "Darth"? Please provide a link to the source, as I did when I added Vitiate to the Darth list. DarthOcclus1977 (talk)
Hi Potsk. Please, update your addition of a {{succession_box}} to Alliance Commander with references. Each line in the template need to be referenced. Thanks. NanoLuuke 10:11, 19 November 2020 (UTC)
Thank you for contributing to Wookieepedia! Please note that at least one of your recent additions added unverified information to a mainspace article. Additions to Wookieepedia's articles must be verifiable by a reliable source per our sourcing policy, and unverified information may be reverted or deleted. Continuing to add unverified information may lead to you being blocked from editing by an administrator. Thank you. UberSoldat93 (talk) 07:06, 7 December 2020 (UTC)
- Could you care to tell me which edit instead of the usual bot-ish message? --Potsk () 07:17, 7 December 2020 (UTC)
Dear Potsk, please don't remove content as you did in the Pierce article, this will be considered vandalism. If there is a mistake in the article, you have to correct it with correct references. In this case, the Pierce recruitment part should be moved to the BtS section, not deleted. Hk 47 (talk) 12:07, 17 December 2020 (UTC)
- I did move it to BtS. --Potsk () 12:26, 17 December 2020 (UTC)
Hi, Potsk, as you're well aware, our sourcing policy requires that any information must be referenced, unlike what you added on Simon Kassianides. If you want to find a source for any dates (or anything in relation to OOU subjects), please note that it must comes from a reliable primary source (no referencing Wikipedia or Imdb, for example). Thanks. --NanoLuuke 14:09, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
To be perfectly honest with you, I weighted on what I should answer, as I had some doubts. My revert of your edit wasn't based on any policy, as there are none on the relevant subject. Still it was my impression that it was what we should do. Further conversations on the subject with others editors convinced me I was right to do so. Regarding the main image on Anakin Skywalker, I would advise not to follow that line of thought as it is a quite complicated and kind of unique topic, as revealed by the article talk page(s) and the history of Consensus Tracks surrounding that article. --NanoLuuke 19:35, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
Per Fandom's Community Creation Policy: "consider that real-life individuals, notable or otherwise, may declare a change as to how they identify themselves and that changes to articles to reflect names, pronouns, and other identifiers of gender are to be respected and accommodated." Robin Pronovost personally requested the removal of that information. Also Fandom has expressed to us that deadnames as redirect should be the only mention to the deadname.--DarthRuiz30 (talk) 21:01, 3 April 2021 (UTC)
I understand what you mean, and I must admit that I forgot that the article started way sooner than I thought it did. Anyway, I stand by my initial argument, the Aegis has not be "seen" around since their last battle, so there's really no evidence to say the Squadron was still active during the timeline covered by the article. Furthermore, to include something in the infobox that wouldn't be featured anywhere else on the article is highly confusing for readers, and forbidden as per the Layout Guide, even if it can be argued that it's "inherently implied by a stated role ", which again is a highly debatable point since the initial information as no place in the article itself. -- NanoLuuke 12:11, 3 May 2021 (UTC)
Hey there. The anon who added the info from the Nathema Conspiracy was actually correct. Echoes of Oblivion shows those characters as spirits, so it's reasonable to assume that they all died on Nathema. OOM 224 ༼༽talk༼༽ 20:52, 9 May 2021 (UTC)
- No, that's still a baseless assumption. They died, sure enough, but not on Nathema as they only ever appear on Nathema based on your own decisions. The "suddenly captured by the Order of Zildrog" part is also purely invented by the editor. --Potsk () 21:17, 9 May 2021 (UTC)
Per our Talk page policy, please do not create talk pages solely to add the Talkheader and WookieeProject templates. Thanks. 1358 (Talk) 16:59, 30 May 2021 (UTC)
In regards to this edit, please verify information from actual sources before changing it. This promotes potential misinformation. UberSoldat93 (talk) 15:17, 10 June 2021 (UTC)
Can you please provide references for your recent additions to the Dark Reaper Crisis? It's a multi-source article, and the original article being unreferenced is no excuse for not referencing your own edits. OOM 224 ༼༽talk༼༽ 20:19, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
Tenebrous' master died in 167 BBY. This is confirmed. I noticed the error in the succession box yesterday, and corrected it, but you reverted it back to say that Tenebrous trained under his master from 167 BBY to 67 BBY. In reality, Tenebrous was Dark lord of the Sith with his apprentices Plaguis and Venamis during that time period. The New Essential Chronology has already proved very unreliable as far as dates are concerned. Can you please allow me to revert it to the correct version? --Jarhead002 Talk 16:53,July 3,2021 (UTC)
May I ask what the source was for renaming the Legends Trade Federation page to "Trade Federation of Planets"?--The All-knowing Sith'ari (talk) 14:05, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
Hello, please note that I've reverted all your edits that added alternate names to characters' infoboxes. It has never been done before, and it should not be done without a previous discussion. Thank you. LucaRoR 14:35, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
- Neither the LG nor the MoS state that alternate names should be put in the infobox. This matter is currently undergoing a discussion on the Wookieepedia Discord server, which you would be welcome to join, and it may lead to a SH. Please refrain from adding the alternate names again until the situation gets sorted. Thanks. LucaRoR 16:04, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
Thank you for contributing to Wookieepedia! Please note that your edit to Arden Lyn added unverified information to a mainspace article. Additions to Wookieepedia's articles must be verifiable by a reliable source per our sourcing policy, and unverified information may be reverted or deleted. If you would like some help learning how to properly source additions, you can see this tutorial or ask for assistance in our Discord server. Continuing to add unverified information may lead to you being blocked from editing by an administrator. Thank you. OOM 224 18:44, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
- I've added a citation. No need for a guide, you could have just said "Hey, this edit needs a citation." --Potsk () 19:04, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
Pretty sure you need to look at the proposed Manual of style link under 'As with the LG restructuring, the MoS has been thoroughly revamped but there are no changes to existing practice, really' on that CT. Because what I linked in my edit summary was from the manual of style Lewisr (talk) 14:53, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
Can you run me through the details of the changes of eyes color for human Sith leading you to modify a few articles recently. Where does this information originate? Looking at the image of Darth Mortis, a color sampling left me with the impression we're seeing colors going from orange to red orange to crimson. However, a quick look at Darth Mortis (on Nathema) on jedipedia.net display this details: "eyecolor_sith_non_h04_s" which seems quite red when presented without any graphic "trick" (lightning, shading, etc). So right now, I'm a bit confused about this, and would appreciate some clarification. NanoLuuke 17:04, 25 June 2022 (UTC)
What reason could you possibly have for removing the red eye color on the Darth Nox page? It is completely uncalled for and unnecessary. Red is one of the eye colors a character can get if they go further in the dark side and make enough dark side choices, so there is no reason to remove it. Andrewh7 (talk) 22:49, 6 July 2022 (UTC) Andrewh7