Talk: UberSoldat93

The 89th EduCorps Meeting is planned to occur on April 17, 2022, specifically at 7:00 PM UTC / 3:00 PM ET. Should your presence be impossible, kindly provide any relevant details. Ayrehead02 (talk) 11:48, 14 March 2022 (UTC)

The 150th AC Meeting is scheduled to be held on Sunday, April 24, 2022, at 7:00 PM UTC / 3:00 PM ET. Indicate if you are unable to be there. Commander Code-8 Hello There! 02:01, 31 March 2022 (UTC)

Greetings, the 137th Inq Meeting is scheduled for 2022-04-30 18:00 UTC, thank you, goodbye. Imperators II(Talk) 17:27, 5 April 2022 (UTC)

The 90th EduCorps Meeting will occur on May 15, 2022, at 7:00 PM UTC / 3:00 PM ET. If you cannot attend, please leave a message. Commander Code-8 Hello There! 09:35, 21 April 2022 (UTC)

Hello there, AC 151 is scheduled for May 22, thank you, goodbye. Imperators II(Talk) 11:07, 30 April 2022 (UTC)

Regrettably, that is not correct. However, it does make an appearance in Servants of the Empire, which could potentially serve as a reference. SilverSunbird (talk) 17:13, 31 May 2022 (UTC)

• Thank you. Moving forward, please refrain from relying directly on information presented in articles, as inaccuracies have been identified repeatedly. UberSoldat93 ( talk ) 17:18, 31 May 2022 (UTC)

The Inquisitorius Meeting 139 is scheduled to be conducted on June 25, 2022 at 18:00 UTC. In the event that you are unable to be present, kindly provide any relevant details. MasterFred(talk) (he/him) 21:24, 7 June 2022 (UTC)

Hello, can you provide the reason for reverting my modification located here? Regards :) ~Mustafar29 (text me back here) 19:14, 14 June 2022 (UTC)

• The existing date notation is adequate in its current form, as it establishes that the character's death occurred sometime prior to 9 BBY. I hope this clarifies the matter. UberSoldat93 ( talk ) 19:18, 14 June 2022 (UTC) However, it lacks precision. Consider that we possess a defined timeframe, yet the infobox only specifies the concluding point. The infobox offers an imprecise representation of his death date given the information available. ~Mustafar29 (text me back here) 19:45, 14 June 2022 (UTC)

Greetings! Is anyone interested in some sky-hopping adventures on Tatooine this July 31st? I assure you it will be an inq'redible heck of a ride at the pleasant hour of 18:00 UTC / 14:00 ET! OOM 224 21:41, 25 June 2022 (UTC)

You are hereby requested to attend an AgriCorps session scheduled for 18:00 UTC on August 7th. Failure to attend will result in personal grudges. Please bring your lawyer. OOM 224 22:18, 2 July 2022 (UTC)

The 93rd EduCorps Meeting is scheduled for 7:00 PM UTC / 3:00 PM ET on August 29, 2022. Please notify us if your presence is not possible. LucaRoR (Talk) 08:30, 25 July 2022 (UTC)

The AC extends its wishes for a Shana Tova at Meeting 155. If you're unable to be there, please let us know. JediMasterMacaroni(Talk) 04:57, 18 September 2022 (UTC)

Fellow delegates, the 94th EduCorps Meeting is scheduled for October 9, 17:00 UTC / 13:00 ET. Please provide notes if you are unable to attend!

Do not forget the 5th of November. Champagne will be available from 20:00 UTC / 16:00 ET onwards. OOM 224 21:04, 9 October 2022 (UTC)

Meeting 156 will be conducted on Sunday, November 13, 2022, at 7:00 PM UTC / 3:00 PM ET. Ayrehead02 (talk) 20:02, 10 October 2022 (UTC)

Acquire your tickets now for the 143th Wookieepedia Grav-Ball Tournament, presented by the Inquisitorius on November 26, 2022, at 6:00 PM UTC / 1:00 PM ET. 1358 (Talk) 20:42, 26 October 2022 (UTC)

What led you to modify it —Unsigned comment by The Supreme Master (talk • contribs).

• Kindly refer to your discussion page. UberSoldat93 ( talk ) 10:51, 29 October 2022 (UTC)

AC meeting 157 is cursing Neptune on Sunday, December 11. If you cannot attend, please provide notes. Commander Code-8 Hello There! 07:56, 20 November 2022 (UTC)

EC meeting 96 will be conducted on Sunday, December 18. If you are unable to attend, please provide notes. Ayrehead02 (talk) 00:00, 21 November 2022 (UTC)

Inq Meeting 144 is scheduled for January 22, 2023. If you cannot attend, please provide a detailed explanation of why Galactic Battlegrounds surpasses Age of Empires. Commander Code-8 Hello There! 12:10, 23 December 2022 (UTC)

Greef Karga announced that EC Meeting 97 is scheduled for February 19, 20:00 UTC / 15:00 ET. If you are unable to attend, please leave notes! Braha'tok enthusiast Hello there 00:56, 18 January 2023 (UTC)

For thoroughly reviewing all of the Rogue Squadron comics, I'm impressed. JediMasterMacaroni(Talk) 07:39, 22 January 2023 (UTC)

• I appreciate that! UberSoldat93 ( talk ) 07:41, 22 January 2023 (UTC)

NBDani (they/them)Yeager's Repairs 13:35, 27 January 2023 (UTC)

Your ability to edit has been suspended for a duration of 1 month. If you wish to challenge this suspension, please reach out to the administrator who issued it, explaining why you believe it to be unwarranted. Reason: For characterizing LGBTQ+ identities as mere "beliefs" within this discussion. As both we and Fandom have clearly stated, these are not matters open for debate. Ayrehead02 (talk) 15:18, 31 January 2023 (UTC)

Once you are able to resume editing, please refrain from deleting the cover images from the individual Star Wars: X-Wing Rogue Squadron comic book pages. Thank you for your attention to this matter. - JMAS Hey, it's me! 01:34, 4 February 2023 (UTC)

Greetings. I noticed that you took down the paragraph I added, which speculated that a ship in Dark Forces might be a BFF-1. I felt it was important to mention this speculation because the game itself doesn't explicitly identify the ship, nor is it definitively shown to be a BFF-1 or anything else. Given that others had previously suggested that the ship could be a BFF-1, and had included Dark Forces in the Appearances section, I decided to address the ambiguity for readers rather than remove "Dark Forces" altogether. While I'm not certain if the ship is indeed a BFF-1, I wanted to bring this up for discussion. What are your thoughts on how this could be better presented? 13:35, 21 April 2023 (UTC)

• Hello, if there are no official sources labeling the ship as a BFF-1, its inclusion in the article is not appropriate. This would be considered original research , which is against the wiki's guidelines. UberSoldat93 ( talk ) 13:40, 21 April 2023 (UTC) I understand. But what should we do about it? Should the smuggler ship (Ergo) be regarded as a BFF-1 or not, even if it resembles one? Should we include it on the BFF-1 page? Should we categorize it under the BFF-1 category? The original research policy advises against including speculation in the article or the BtS section, but it doesn't provide guidance on how to handle a ship that visually resembles a particular type. CanIPlay (talk) 13:30, 24 April 2023 (UTC) After reviewing the screenshot, I think it's too unclear to make a determination. I would suggest avoiding any comparisons altogether. UberSoldat93 (talk) 15:11, 24 April 2023 (UTC)

Considering that the canon policy stipulates that Nexus of Power should be considered part of both canon and Legends continuities, it's appropriate to have separate pages for each, as you mentioned. However, upon reviewing the edit history, I noticed that the articles I modified were originally written as Legends articles, with a user simply altering a few links. These articles primarily contained Legends links and were linked to by other Legends articles. Additionally, policies dictate that when creating a counterpart article for another continuity, it should not be a simple copy but should be written independently, which was not the case here.

Furthermore, your reversions introduced fanon content to the article, as the source does not specify the exact class of ship that crashed on the planet (although it resembles a Star Destroyer, it's not our place to determine that). Additionally, there is no information regarding the time period or faction to which the ship belonged. Boats1014 (talk) 13:05, 30 April 2023 (UTC)

• My apologies, I completely overlooked that. Please, feel free to proceed. UberSoldat93 ( talk ) 15:48, 30 April 2023 (UTC)

They are basically the same thing, similar to the Separatist Parliament --Goodmind (talk) 07:50, 20 May 2023 (UTC)

• Is that all there is to it? In the situation of the Separatist Parliament, there is documentation presenting different names for the same subject matter. UberSoldat93 ( talk ) 07:54, 20 May 2023 (UTC) Also, Elaine Cunningham was the author of both Dark Journey and Red Sky, Blue Flame. I will remove it if this is not sufficient --Goodmind (talk) 06:04, 21 May 2023 (UTC) That's a much better explanation. You can go ahead and merge it. You should have mentioned that to begin with :P UberSoldat93 (talk) 08:13, 21 May 2023 (UTC) I'm refraining from marking the article for review for this specific reason. UberSoldat93 (talk) 06:08, 22 May 2023 (UTC)

I appreciate the notification; I will update the images to align with the policy as soon as possible. Thanks! Bonzane10 (holonet) 12:20, 8 June 2023 (UTC)

You deleted the preceding and subsequent battles, citing compliance with the Layout Guide. Which specific part of the guide were you following? Red Heathen (talk) 01:46, 27 June 2023 (UTC)

• I was referencing this clause . It appears I made an error in removing the previous event. However, the other event was not mentioned anywhere within the article's main text. UberSoldat93 ( talk ) 05:05, 27 June 2023 (UTC)

I appreciate that, and I'll make an effort to remember it :) --Possess you. That is what I say when people sneeze. 😉–Nightlily (sing your song) 17:30, 28 June 2023 (UTC)

Hello, the webpage titled "Ships: B-Wing" is a subpage located within the "Player Ships and Ship Handling Chart." You have the ability to locate a link to this particular page, in addition to the date it was published, within the complete index of all SWG's "Friday Features" here. Please let me know if you have any other inquiries. Best, Hk 47 (talk) 20:16, 30 June 2023 (UTC)

• Thanks! UberSoldat93 ( talk ) 20:20, 30 June 2023 (UTC)

Given that they have names, it doesn't seem logical that they wouldn't have their own pages --Goodmind (talk) 10:07, 19 July 2023 (UTC)

Thank you for pointing that out! I began adding it to pages (primarily trade routes) that are featured in the blog post image but are not explicitly named. It's possible that I accidentally left it there while copy-pasting. Additionally, I was uncertain because the image on the blog post is so small and difficult to read that the labels on the image are practically meaningless in that format. However, I'm happy to remove it if you believe that's the best course of action. Have a great day! LadyNeret (talk) 04:30, 2 August 2023 (UTC)

Thank you, I've actually been utilizing the template! Have a great day! :) LadyNeret (talk) 00:47, 17 August 2023 (UTC)

Thank you for bringing this to my attention. However, I don't actually possess the magazine; I simply copied the information from the Tyrant page, so I'm not sure how to correct it. ThrawnChiss7 Assembly Cupola 21:59, 5 January 2024 (UTC)

• Get in touch with someone who has the magazine. I believe Ayre has a copy. UberSoldat93 ( talk ) 00:37, 6 January 2024 (UTC)

Hello, I dedicated some time to understanding the mechanics of the game, including the use of game editors to examine the game files. I discovered that all missions share the same generic black starry background. However, for certain space maps, planets are specifically added in a similar manner to how space stations are added to other maps. Based on my estimation, there are approximately 10 different planet models that are used in about half of the story mission maps. The various planet models may be reused in multiple maps, but each map containing a planet features one specific planet model. When these planets appear in the missions, they are also identified in the briefings (see here). I hope my explanation is clear. Best, Hk 47 (talk) 10:41, 29 January 2024 (UTC)

• That makes perfect sense, thank you for the explanation. UberSoldat93 ( talk ) 10:48, 29 January 2024 (UTC)

I'm not very active on this site, and I'm not the biggest Star Wars enthusiast. I don't quite understand why you removed the "Crossover characters" category from Homer Simpson, Marge Simpson, and Maggie Simpson. I understand that they originate from material that this site considers "non-canon," but there are other pages tagged as "non-canon" within the category, and these characters are not from the Star Wars franchise. Cookieboy 2005 (talk) 00:37, 9 February 2024 (UTC)

• My mistake, I didn't realize that was an actual category. Feel free to add it back in. Thanks. UberSoldat93 ( talk ) 10:54, 9 February 2024 (UTC)

Hello again, I noticed that you relocated the "Coded transmissions" source from the Appearances section to the Sources section. Initially, I wondered why someone would have placed the manual in the Appearances section, but I suspect it was because it's presented as an in-universe text. Perhaps you might want to consider this perspective. I'm not sure what the MoS says about such cases. CanIPlay (talk) 16:08, 14 February 2024 (UTC)

• I created a separate page for the explicitly in-universe Coded Transmission: Jan Ors to Mon Mothma, which I placed under Appearances. The manual itself was moved to Sources. This decision was made following a discussion with other editors on our Discord server, who agreed that the manual is an out-of-universe guide and should not be treated as an Appearances item. UberSoldat93 ( talk ) 16:12, 14 February 2024 (UTC)

Hello UberSoldat93, I am not sure what you are referring to. If you are talking about the six legs versus four legs issue, here is the explanation: In Revenge of the Sith, the crab droids were small like clone troopers and had six legs. However, in The Clone Wars, they were much larger and had four legs. So I thought I could help correct that information. But if people think I'm wrong, they can change it. User:Batman505 (talk 06:18, March 5, 2024 (MST)

• Hello, I am not entirely sure what you are asking about. Would you mind clarifying? UberSoldat93 ( talk ) 09:00, 6 March 2024 (UTC)

"

Imperators II(Talk) 19:23, 13 March 2024 (UTC)

• I appreciate it! UberSoldat93 ( talk ) 06:58, 14 March 2024 (UTC)

As indicated in the behind-the-scenes section of the Picaroon C. Boodle article, the species of neither Pic nor Gorc was identified in the original game, Dark Forces: Jedi Knight. Furthermore, Gorc and Pic shared similar characteristics, such as the same number of fingers and toes, suggesting that they were intended to be the same alien race. Therefore, the fact that Gorc was not identified as a Gamorrean/Legends until later should be noted. Vrung (talk) 19:34, 26 March 2024 (UTC)

• The BTS information regarding Pic and Gorc is somewhat repetitive, as that detail is adequately conveyed through the article's references and content. UberSoldat93 ( talk ) 19:38, 26 March 2024 (UTC) Currently, only the Pic article mentions that the Sith Brothers' species was not identified in their initial appearance. Neither Pic's species nor his full name were ever stated in Jedi Knight: Dark Forces II, his first appearance Unless I'm missing something, I believe we should add a similar note to Gorc's article on the site. Vrung (talk) 19:41, 26 March 2024 (UTC)

Hello, thank you very much. Actually, I have to confess that my current work with TOR is far less challenging than what I previously did with the Galaxies webpages, which were accessible only through the Internet Archive! Best, Hk 47 (talk) 20:21, 13 April 2024 (UTC)