Greetings, Elijah Palmer! ## Unconfirmed Details Thank you for your contributions to Wookieepedia! It has come to our attention that your recent modification to the Vader's armor page introduced information that has not been verified within a mainspace article. According to our sourcing policy, all additions to Wookieepedia articles must be supported by a reliable source. Unsubstantiated information is subject to reversion or removal. Repeatedly adding unverified details may result in an administrator blocking your editing privileges. Thank you for your understanding. Furthermore, we kindly request that you familiarize yourself with the Layout Guide and the Manual of Style, which provide comprehensive rules and guidelines for mainspace articles. - - - OOM 224 ༼༽༼༽ 08:18, June 8, 2020 (UTC) - Once more, your edits lack proper sourcing and will be immediately reverted. Continued actions of this nature will lead to you being blocked. Additionally, the helmet was not present on the Steadfast during its destruction; it was teleported to Kijimi during the confrontation between Rey and Kylo. RattsT ( talk ) 03:16, June 9, 2020 (UTC) ## Vader's Helmet Salutations! The last observed location of Vader's helmet was its transportation to Kijimi during the Force bond sequence involving Rey and Kylo in his private quarters. The helmet's subsequent fate remains unknown. Therefore, we should refrain from speculating about its destruction at this time. --Lewisr (talk) 03:18, June 9, 2020 (UTC) ## Restriction from Editing Your editing privileges have been suspended for a duration of 1 day due to violations of the Three-revert rule. If you wish to challenge this restriction, please contact the administrator who imposed it, providing your reasons for believing the block is unwarranted. --DarthRuiz30 (talk) 03:29, June 9, 2020 (UTC) ## Notification Hello Elijah, as you have received prior warnings, kindly cease adding unverified information to pages. If you require assistance in locating sources for information you wish to include, feel free to leave a message on my discussion page. However, please be advised that adding fan-created content to articles is contrary to this wiki's policies and should instead be placed on the fanon wiki. Should you persist in adding unverified information or fan-created content, you will face another editing restriction. Thank you, Ayrehead02 (talk) 13:33, June 19, 2020 (UTC) ## Content Removal Refrain from removing content from Wookieepedia. This action is regarded as vandalism. If you desire to experiment, kindly utilize the sandbox. Thank you. UberSoldat93 (talk) 16:23, 15 April 2021 (UTC) ## Message Signatures Please ensure you sign your messages using four tildes. UberSoldat93 (talk) 16:51, 15 April 2021 (UTC) ## Tense Usage Why is the past tense used for every character? ## Speculative Content Kindly refrain from introducing speculative content into articles, as demonstrated here. UberSoldat93 (talk) 13:47, 3 February 2022 (UTC) - We appreciate your contributions to Wookieepedia! However, it's important to note that your addition to the Ugnaught bean casserole page included unverified information within a mainspace article. All additions to Wookieepedia's articles must be verifiable through a reliable source in accordance with our sourcing policy. Unverified information is subject to removal or deletion. If you require guidance on properly sourcing additions, please consult this tutorial or seek assistance on our Discord server. Thank you! JediMasterMacaroni (Talk) 19:01, 10 March 2022 (UTC) Please verify: https://starwars.fandom.com/wiki/Ugnaught_bean_casserole Elijah Palmer(Talk) 08:13, 14 March 2022 (EST) ## Copying and Pasting Kindly avoid directly copying and pasting content from other articles, as this constitutes plagiarism and violates the CC-BY-SA license mentioned below the editing window. UberSoldat93 (talk) 15:10, 11 September 2022 (UTC) ## Boba's Palace Garage Hello. Does any source provide the name "Boba's Palace garage"? If not, it should be reverted to the canonical name "Jabba's Palace garage," as per Wookieepedia:Naming_policy#General_rules. OOM 224 10:00, 19 September 2022 (UTC) ## Image Uploads We appreciate your contributions to Wookieepedia! While all good-faith contributions are valued, we kindly request that you review our Image policy and ensure you understand the sourcing and licensing requirements before uploading additional images. The only supported uploading method on Wookieepedia, Special:Upload, will prompt you to provide this information. Thank you! JediMasterMacaroni(Talk) 17:08, 2 November 2022 (UTC) ## R3-D5 Greetings - do you possess a source confirming the name of R3-D5/Canon? If not, the article will be subject to deletion. JediMasterMacaroni(Talk) 03:14, 15 December 2022 (UTC) - Yes, he appeared in the episode. User:Elijah Palmer User talk:Elijah Palmer 10:22, 14 December 2022 (EST) However, I don't believe he is named in the episode; is that correct? JediMasterMacaroni(Talk) 04:50, 15 December 2022 (UTC) Yes, but it is his Canonical name. User:Elijah PalmerUser talk:Elijah Palmer 11:53, 14 December 2022 (EST) What is the source of that information? JediMasterMacaroni(Talk) 23:32, 15 December 2022 (UTC) The episode itself User:Elijah PalmerUser talk:Elijah Palmer 19:12, 15 December 2022 (EST) I've re-examined the episode and confirmed that his name is never mentioned. Therefore, the article will need to be deleted. Also, kindly remember to sign your messages using four tildes (~~~~). JediMasterMacaroni(Talk) 01:39, 16 December 2022 (UTC) Wait! What about the Lego set? We can use that as a source! Elijah Palmer(Talk) ## Star Wars Resistance and 34 ABY Greetings, Star Wars: Timelines has recently been released, providing dates for all events in Star Wars Resistance, setting them in 34 ABY. Please ensure that the dates on the relevant articles reflect this information, rather than 35 ABY. Thank you for your contribution! NBDani (they/them)Yeager's Repairs 12:02, 17 April 2023 (UTC) ## Sourcing Gender Hello! You may have observed that I have been reverting your edits that designate Lys Solay and Nash Durango as female. While it is probable that they are intended to be female, Wookieepedia's policies, as outlined in the discussion Forum:SH:Making use of pronouns, prevent us from assuming gender based solely on appearance or voice. If you can locate another source that explicitly refers to them as female or uses feminine terms, that would serve as sufficient evidence. However, I have reviewed the episodes you cited multiple times and have not found any lines supporting this. If you believe there is a line of dialogue or detail that I have overlooked, please feel free to inform me in the replies. Kind regards, JM1998 (talk) 12:49, 25 April 2023 (UTC) ## Notification I apologize for my edit warring, but it has recently been confirmed by the Shorts of YJA that Nash and Lys are female. Information from an official production constitutes a reliable source. User:Elijah Palmer User talk:Elijah Palmer 9:28, 25 April 2023 (EST) ## Gender Identification I want to begin by expressing my appreciation for your efforts to assist. However, I would like to take a moment to discuss the process of gendering characters with you. I have reviewed "Meet the Young Jedi" twice this morning, and unfortunately, Lys Solay is not identified as female within the episode. The use of she/her pronouns, as presented in the episode, is no longer considered indicative of gender on the Wook. I encourage you to read Forum:SH:Making use of pronouns to gain a better understanding of the distinction between Gender and Pronouns. We could list her as female if a character/subtitles referred to her as lady, girl, woman, etc. I anticipate that a novel or reference book will eventually be released to confirm her gender, but current policy dictates that we refrain from assuming it. If you would like assistance in determining when we can identify gender, please feel free to contact me on my Talk page or join the Discord, where numerous editors can provide real-time assistance. Thank you for your time. NBDani (they/them)Yeager's Repairs 13:44, 25 April 2023 (UTC) ## R5-c4 You have included information on the page regarding R2-C4, but I am unable to locate it in the source. Could you please specify the page where it can be found? ## Image Uploads Thank you for your contributions to Wookieepedia! While all good-faith contributions are appreciated, we kindly request that you review our Image policy and ensure you understand the sourcing and licensing requirements before uploading additional images. The only supported uploading method on Wookieepedia, Special:Upload, will prompt you to provide this information. Thank you! Anıl Şerifoğlu (talk) 16:37, 16 June 2023 (UTC) - Kindly refrain from uploading files without providing all the information mandated by our Image policy. The only supported uploading method on Wookieepedia, Special:Upload, will prompt you to enter this information. Failure to provide the necessary information when uploading files may result in an administrator blocking your editing privileges. Thank you for your cooperation. Anıl Şerifoğlu ( talk ) 16:46, 16 June 2023 (UTC) ## Editing Restriction Your ability to contribute has been suspended for a period of one week due to your continued uploading of images without adhering to the provided instructions. If you wish to contest this restriction, please contact the administrator who imposed it, providing your reasons for believing the block is unjustified. Anıl Şerifoğlu (talk) 00:37, 23 June 2023 (UTC) ## R2-C4 Hello, we are generally moving away from making assumptions based on R2/R3 suffixes, which is why that edit was reverted, as it has been previously Lewisr (talk) 02:12, 17 July 2023 (UTC) But the R2-C4 (Bail Organa) article has the R2 suffix, and he is referred to as an R2 unit. User:Elijah Palmer (talk) 22:19, 16 July 2023 (EST) - If there is no actual reference in the material to R2-C4 being an R2 unit, then it should be removed Lewisr ( talk ) 02:37, 17 July 2023 (UTC) - I have removed it. User:Elijah Palmer ( talk ) 22:42, 16 July 2023 (EST) Excellent, thank you! Feel free to do the same on any others you encounter Lewisr (talk) 04:07, 17 July 2023 (UTC) ## Notification Regarding T-6 - You have nearly violated policy here as well. As Lewisr and I have stated in the edit summaries of the relevant pages, a source is required before the shuttle from that FoD episode can be identified as the same as Ahsoka's Fan26 ( Talk ) 22:43, 25 August 2023 (UTC) TV Tropes is not an official source that can be used to confirm the ship is the same one as in FOD. You need an official source, such as StarWars.com, a reference book, or potentially a link to someone working on the shows stating that they are the same. I hope this clarifies what you need. Lewisr (talk) 23:49, 25 August 2023 (UTC) It does, thank you. Elijah Palmer(talk) 19:52, 25 August 2023 (EST) Thank you for your understanding! Feel free to ask if you require further assistance Lewisr (talk) 23:58, 25 August 2023 (UTC) Hi, concerning this edit summary, I wanted to clarify that TVTropes is not a valid source. It is essentially a wiki site itself and does not provide citations. While I enjoy it as a website, it is not encyclopedic, let alone a valid source for canonical information. Fan26 (Talk) 23:52, 25 August 2023 (UTC) Ah, wait, Lew already addressed it just before I did, sorry! Fan26 (Talk) 23:52, 25 August 2023 (UTC) ## Clan Wren It does not specify which members of the family were killed. Therefore, we should refrain from stating who was killed until we can be certain Lewisr (talk) 20:32, 9 September 2023 (UTC) ## Chopper in D-Squad Because I've read the issue and know he doesn't join the team Lewisr (talk) 15:35, 20 September 2023 (UTC) - Ok, I apologize for the misunderstanding. User:Elijah Palmer ( talk ) 11:48, 20 September 2023 (EST) No worries! Lewisr (talk) 00:41, 21 September 2023 (UTC) ## R2 D-Squad I am not skilled at large-scale writing, so my attempt may not be satisfactory. Are you seeking information on what occurred in the issue? Lewisr (talk) 00:40, 21 September 2023 (UTC) - I have already provided the information for the main Dark Droids series. So, yes, to update the information. User:Elijah Palmer ( talk ) 20:46, 20 September 2023 (EST) ## RE: Droid Template Kindly refrain from repeatedly adding the type field without including a placeholder value. Many droid infoboxes, such as TAY-0, appear broken as a result. Thank you, Anıl Şerifoğlu (talk) 20:24, 7 October 2023 (UTC) - What is a placeholder value? User:Elijah Palmer (User talk:Elijah Palmer) 16:29, 7 October 2023 Greetings! What Anil meant above is that it will be more efficient and practical to first automatically add the new parameter to the template on all the droid pages with a bot - I've currently left a request for such a bot edit on Wookieepedia's Discord server, so let's just be patient for a bit. The idea is also that a bot will populate this new field with some kind of temporary value that can then be used to easily identify any articles needing manual filling out. Cheers, Imperators II(Talk) 20:50, 7 October 2023 (UTC) Thank you! User:Elijah Palmer (User talk:Elijah Palmer) 16:53, 7 October 2023 ## Response Hello, I just noticed your message, although I see that the situation has already been explained above! Apologies Lewisr (talk) 20:59, 7 October 2023 (UTC) ## Patience Hello Elijah. I kindly request that you exercise patience regarding the droid type field request. Please remember that all editors contribute voluntarily, so progress may take time, especially if the bot operators are occupied with other tasks. The request will be fulfilled, but continually inquiring about its status or updating the request is likely to delay it further. I understand your eagerness to update the pages, but please be patient, and it will be completed. Thank you! Lewisr (talk) 14:52, 13 October 2023 (UTC) ## R8 Series Droid Hello! Thank you for creating the R8 series droid article. When creating articles, be sure to only include reliable sources and only put information that is officially confirmed on pages. Additionally, be sure to name articles only based on what we know they're referred to as in their respective continuity; names should not be based on their Legends counterpart. - Thannus (DFaceG) (he/him) (talk) 19:37, 31 October 2023 (UTC) ## Team Colossus The difference is that most of the Colossus residents weren't fighting the First Order for the Resistance; they were fighting them to repel them from their home. A few of them are actually affiliated with the Resistance, but not every single resident is Lewisr (talk) 23:34, 31 October 2023 (UTC) ## Hyphens Hello Elijah, this is a legitimate use of hyphens that is also noted in our own Manual of Style. Anıl Şerifoğlu (talk) 03:30, 1 November 2023 (UTC) ## Infobox Type Fields Elijah, please refrain from filling the character/droid infobox type fields with inappropriate values solely for the sake of having one, as not all infoboxes require them. For example, the character R2-C4 is not a "bureaucrat" even though it served Bail Organa, and the article for R2-R9, which is also a status article, does not explicitly state any Republic affiliation for the droid. Anıl Şerifoğlu (talk) 04:03, 1 November 2023 (UTC) - But G3-R8 has the Galactic Republic infobox type field! User:Elijah Palmer ( talk ) 00:16, 1 November 2023 (EST) I apologize, I do not understand what you are referring to. That is a redlink. Anıl Şerifoğlu (talk) 04:20, 1 November 2023 (UTC) I meant G8-R3.User:Elijah Palmer (talk) 00:25, 1 November 2023 (EST) That is also inaccurate. Anıl Şerifoğlu (talk) 04:38, 1 November 2023 (UTC) User:JMM added it there.User:Elijah Palmer (talk) 00:42, 1 November 2023 (EST) Yes, I observed that in the edit history. Anıl Şerifoğlu (talk) 04:43, 1 November 2023 (UTC) Elijah, I am kindly requesting again that you cease attempting to create an infobox type for articles that do not necessarily align with any of the existing color schemes. Lorn Pavan, for instance, is not listed as a "Jedi" simply because he worked at the Jedi Temple. Similarly, Gersolik, who works in a dining establishment, and Rosack Denahst, a miner employed in a corporation's mines, are not listed as "Corporate" individuals. All of these examples are status articles, by the way, which means they have been reviewed by multiple editors for accuracy. Anıl Şerifoğlu (talk) 14:25, 1 November 2023 (UTC) So, which articles are suitable?User:Elijah Palmer (talk) 11:06, 1 November 2023 (EST) "Jedi" obviously stands for Jedi characters, and regarding the "Corporate" category, the actual corporation members that come to mind would be Orman Tagge of the Tagge Corporation, Mak Plain of the Banking Clan, or a more recent example like Hyne of Preox-Morlana. Similarly, a droid that served someone who committed crimes does not necessarily have to be a criminal. Anıl Şerifoğlu (talk) 17:11, 1 November 2023 (UTC) Ok thanks for clearing that up!User:Elijah Palmer (talk) 13:17, 1 November 2023 (EST) Sure, no problem! Anıl Şerifoğlu (talk) 17:21, 1 November 2023 (UTC) Please, for the last time, I am kindly asking you to refrain from continuing to add inappropriate droid "type" fields. As I have explained above and provided some status article examples, that R4 astromech is not a "Sith," and therefore should not be listed as such in the infobox. Additionally, I recommend that you refrain from creating any other unidentified astromech pages until you have a better understanding of the notability policy, as all the articles you have created have been nominated for deletion, which is time-consuming for other editors. Thank you for your cooperation. Anıl Şerifoğlu (talk) 15:27, 5 November 2023 (UTC) I am aware that the droid is not a Sith. I included Sith in the type field because it is a Sith droid.User:Elijah Palmer (talk) 10:43, 5 November 2023 (EST) If the character in question is not a Sith, then that should not be listed in the type field. The same principle applies to all type options. Anıl Şerifoğlu (talk) 16:41, 5 November 2023 (UTC) ## Notability Greetings. Please refrain from acting impulsively when it comes to article creations or Consensus track votes. It is generally advisable to engage in community discussion on Forum:Senate Hall first to ensure that a proposal without prior discussion does not face immediate rejection. Editors hold varying opinions on article notability, but we do have policies in place that have evolved from numerous discussions on the topic, as well as ongoing Trash compactor threads where notability can be discussed. It is prudent to consult with other Wookieepedians before taking actions that disregard existing policies and practices. OOM 224 (he/him) 12:58, 2 November 2023 (UTC) - I would also like to add that you are already a member of Wookieepedia's Discord server, so feel free to ask any questions or make any suggestions you have there, as you can sometimes receive a response even faster than by posting on the site. I hope this helps, Imperators II(Talk) 08:32, 3 November 2023 (UTC) ## Article Quality When creating an article, please ensure that its quality meets the standards of Wook's policy. Bonzane10
(holonet) 05:42, November 3, 2023 (UTC) - Greetings! I just wanted to contribute to the discussion above. It is important that you include proper citations for everything you contribute, including all parameters within infoboxes. It has been observed that many articles you have started frequently lack the necessary citations. Considering your tenure as an editor, you should already be well-versed in Wookieepedia's established policy. Best regards! Bonzane10 (holonet) 15:51, November 5, 2023 (UTC) ## Regarding BD Unit - Since that specific page relies exclusively on a LEGO source, it is regarded as non-canonical. The page ought to have been designated as such at some point (I am genuinely surprised that it was overlooked during the nomination phase), but that is the standard procedure for topics derived entirely from LEGO. As I stated in the page's modification history, the situation would differ if it involved a canonical subject merely identified within the set. - Thannus (DFaceG) (he/him) ( talk ) 18:21, November 4, 2023 (UTC) Understood. However, could a LEGO set potentially be considered a Retcon? In the LEGO Classic Star Wars set (Set: 75365 Yavin 4 Rebel Base), R2-BHD is depicted as Jon Vander's astromech droid during the Battle of Yavin. Elijah Palmer (talk) 14:29, November 4, 2023 (EST) Given that a LEGO set is not recognized as a canonical depiction of events (even if it's an official product), the answer is no. Unless a fully canonical source explicitly states that R2-BHD served as the astromech used, it cannot be considered canonically accurate—although it warrants mention within the BTS sections of relevant articles. The sole influence that LEGO sets (or any LEGO source) exert on full canon is in scenarios where they offer identification for a subject already established within full canon. - Thannus (DFaceG) (he/him) (talk) 18:37, November 4, 2023 (UTC) In that case, wouldn't that inherently render Behold-Urwar Droid Concepts as canon since it identified the manufacturer of BD-1? After all, a Lego set provided R3-D5 with its designation. Elijah Palmer (talk) 14:48, November 4, 2023 (EST) Negative. Behold-Urwar receives absolutely no mention in any fully canonical source, not even through a speculative designation such as "BD-1's manufacturer." R3-D5, however, is featured in a canonical source. - Thannus (DFaceG) (he/him) (talk) 19:49, November 4, 2023 (UTC) ## Dispute Concerning BD Unit ## REGARDING RD-3 The presence of similar domes does not automatically imply that they are identical models. Furthermore, unlike SK-620, RD-3 lacks an SK designation. Anıl Şerifoğlu (talk) 00:14, November 9, 2023 (UTC) ## R7 Unit When it comes to naming articles, always ensure that the name being utilized in the article is explicitly present within a source. It should not be inferred or extrapolated from the name of another subject. - Thannus (DFaceG) (he/him) (talk) 01:07, November 9, 2023 (UTC) - Also, remember to include in-universe categories when creating new articles. - Thannus (DFaceG) (he/him) ( talk ) 01:10, November 9, 2023 (UTC) ## Restriction from Editing Your ability to contribute has been suspended for a duration of 2 weeks due to persistent engagement in edit warring, despite receiving multiple prior warnings. If you wish to challenge this restriction, kindly contact the administrator who imposed the block, providing a justification for why you believe the block to be unwarranted. Supreme Emperor Holocomm 02:35, November 9, 2023 (UTC) ## Regarding R7-TNO Hello, Elijah. To begin, Rebelscum.com is not an official website sanctioned by Lucasfilm. Concerning R7-TNO, as you are aware, this matter has been previously addressed within your Senate Hall thread; however, you persisted in reverting your edits regardless, ultimately leading to your temporary suspension for edit warring. Should you continue to exhibit this behavior, you may face another suspension from editing, potentially for an extended duration. Anıl Şerifoğlu (talk) 17:01, November 23, 2023 (UTC) - However, it identifies him as an R7 droid, and Rebelscum.com maintains a page on the wiki and has been utilized as an external link. Even this website identifies it as an R7 unit https://www.fanthatracks.com/news/collecting/disney-parks-droid-factory-round-up/ Elijah Palmer ( talk ) 12:23, November 23, 2023 (EST) As I have previously stated, neither Rebelscum.com nor its YouTube channel constitute an official source for canonical information. Anıl Şerifoğlu (talk) 18:14, November 23, 2023 (UTC) Even this website says it's an r7 unit https://www.fanthatracks.com/news/collecting/disney-parks-droid-factory-round-up/ Elijah Palmer(talk) 13:18, November 23, 2023 (EST) Once again, external websites are not considered authoritative sources for canonical details. Anıl Şerifoğlu (talk) 19:48, November 23, 2023 (UTC) Although, Fantha Tracks did identify the actor for Danz Borin within canon. Elijah Palmer(talk) 15:11, November 23, 2023 (EST) The identity of an actor is unrelated to "canon"; it does not constitute in-universe information pertaining to the fictional Star Wars universe. Anıl Şerifoğlu (talk) 13:44, November 24, 2023 (UTC) WDW News is also not In-universe. Fanthatracks is a reliable source on this wiki. The "Changeling" Mark 71NB being an example. As it was named after Mark Newbold. Elijah Palmer(talk) 09:06, November 24, 2023 (EST) ## Dependable Resources I've observed a degree of uncertainty concerning what qualifies as a reliable source on Wookieepedia, as well as the circumstances under which a source is deemed reliable, as evident in the discussion on Talk:R7-TNO. I strongly advise reviewing Wookieepedia's Sourcing policy to gain clarity on this matter; it should ideally resolve any existing confusion. - Thannus (DFaceG) (he/him) (talk) 16:43, November 24, 2023 (UTC) ## Recommendation Hey Elijah, I would highly recommend that you refrain from engaging further with the R7-FNG topic. The packaging does not explicitly identify the droid as an R7 unit; it is merely the droid's designation. Moreover, we no longer make assumptions based on suffixes, as I previously mentioned to you regarding R2-C4 (Bail Organa) here. Considering that the specific issue of R7-FNG was the catalyst for your previous ban, revisiting it immediately is ill-advised and could potentially lead to another ban if you persist in arguing about it. Thank you. Lewisr (talk) 19:49, November 24, 2023 (UTC) - Elijah, kindly cease adding unverified details to the articles. If you continue to do so despite repeated warnings and clarifications from myself and other editors on the talk pages, as well as in your Senate Hall threads, you will be prohibited from editing. Anıl Şerifoğlu ( talk ) 22:32, November 24, 2023 (UTC) ## Categories Upon creating an article, kindly ensure that it is adequately categorized using relevant in-universe categories. While adding categories shortly after creation is acceptable, leaving a page without any categories beyond those automatically supplied by a template can make it challenging for users to locate when browsing the wiki. At a minimum, ensure that each page includes at least one in-universe category. - Thannus (DFaceG) (he/him) (talk) 03:32, November 25, 2023 (UTC) ## Towani Does the LEGO Star Wars: The Skywalker Saga game actually mention the family by name and state they were crash-landed, or is the entire article based purely on that in-game image in the infobox? Anıl Şerifoğlu (talk) 01:28, November 26, 2023 (UTC) - Affirmative. The game references them. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nyYpjUJiZx4 Elijah Palmer ( User talk:Elijah Palmer ) 20:34, November 25, 2023 (EST) I regret to inform you that I still cannot find any mentions of "Towani." Anıl Şerifoğlu (talk) 01:37, November 26, 2023 (UTC) https://www.reddit.com/r/LegoStarWarsVideoGame/comments/ujxkf8/pretty_cool_seeing_this_reference_to_the_ewok/ Elijah Palmer(User talk:Elijah Palmer) 21:13, November 25, 2023 (EST) That is simply a Reddit post from a fan. Anıl Şerifoğlu (talk) 02:18, November 26, 2023 (UTC) ## Editing Privileges Revoked Your ability to contribute has been suspended for a duration of one month due to your continued addition of unverified information, relying on unofficial fan websites and social media posts, despite numerous prior warnings. Please utilize this period to thoroughly familiarize yourself with Wookieepedia's sourcing policy. Should you wish to contest this restriction, please contact the administrator who issued the block, providing a justification for why you believe the block to be unwarranted. Anıl Şerifoğlu (talk) 02:28, November 26, 2023 (UTC) ## Concerning TC Hi, Elijah. I have already articulated my rationale for why I believe they lack sufficient notability to warrant their own articles on the TC page. You are welcome to present your argument for why you believe they should not be deleted there, and the ultimate decision rests with the community. Furthermore, I strongly advise against creating additional pages similar to those already deleted per TC in the future. Continuing to do so despite clear community consensus would be regarded as a disruption and may result in another suspension from editing. Anıl Şerifoğlu (talk) 03:41, January 1, 2024 (UTC) - However, the lightsabers played a significant role in the episode's narrative. Elijah Palmer ( talk ) 22:47, December 31, 2023 (EST) As I mentioned, my reasoning is already detailed in Forum:TC:LEGO lightsabers, and you are encouraged to present your case for why you believe they should not be deleted there. Anıl Şerifoğlu (talk) 03:54, January 1, 2024 (UTC) I did, but there has been no discussion. I posted a comment on it. Elijah Palmer (talk) 22:57, December 31, 2023 (EST) That suggests that other editors who have voted do not find that argument compelling enough to justify retaining the articles. Anıl Şerifoğlu (talk) 04:03, January 1, 2024 (UTC) ## Editing Privileges Revoked Your ability to contribute has been suspended for a duration of three months due to sockpuppetry through User:Ew11aaq1. If you wish to challenge this restriction, please contact the administrator who issued the block, providing a justification for why you believe the block to be unwarranted. Anıl Şerifoğlu (talk) 04:22, January 1, 2024 (UTC) ## Concerning Unidentified Astromech Droids Please refrain from recreating them in the future. For the time being, I advise against creating any additional unidentified pages and encourage you to take the time to develop a more thorough understanding of the notability policy, as nearly all of the articles you have created have been nominated for deletion, which is time-consuming for other editors. Thank you for your cooperation. Anıl Şerifoğlu (talk) 14:59, April 1, 2024 (UTC) - As per the message above, I am respectfully requesting that you refrain from creating any unnamed astromech articles, at least for the time being. Anıl Şerifoğlu ( talk ) 15:54, April 11, 2024 (UTC) Understood, but I was only creating those astromech pages because they had story significance such as when the astromech droids on saleucami, lothal and geonosis actually interacted with the characters. User:Elijah Palmer (talk) 12:04, April 11, 2024 (EST) We literally had this conversation only three days ago; please refrain from creating more unnamed character articles for a while. There are many existing articles that could benefit from your contributions while you develop a solid understanding of the policies. Anıl Şerifoğlu (talk) 18:40, April 14, 2024 (UTC) But for how long though? Because the astromech who fought with Chopper needs a page. Elijah Palmer (talk) 18:42, April 14, 2024 (UTC) ## Image Uploads Please ensure that you include all of the information required by our Image policy when uploading files. The sole uploading method supported by Wookieepedia, Special:Upload, will prompt you to enter this information. Uploading additional files without the necessary information may result in an administrator blocking you from editing. Thank you for your cooperation. Anıl Şerifoğlu (talk) 15:54, April 11, 2024 (UTC) ## Infobox Type Fields #2 With regard to your edits to Todo articles, kindly re-read the message above concerning the appropriate use of the infobox "type" field. Thank you. Anıl Şerifoğlu (talk) 18:19, April 14, 2024 (UTC) Please refrain from replacing Wookieepedia pages with blank content. Blank pages are detrimental to Wookieepedia as they tend to confuse readers. If it is a duplicate article, please redirect it to an appropriate existing page. If the page has been vandalized, please revert it to the last legitimate version. If you believe that the content of a page is inappropriate, please edit the page and replace it with appropriate content. If you believe there is no hope for the page, please see the deletion policy for how to proceed. Thank you for contributing to Wookieepedia, the Star Wars wiki! ## Editing Privileges Revoked Your ability to contribute has been suspended for a duration of six months due to persistent edit warring. Elijah, as a seasoned user of this platform and an editor who has been warned and blocked multiple times for edit warring in the past, you should be well aware that you must not perform more than three consecutive reversions on a single article, unless it involves clear vandalism. Instead of attempting to resolve the dispute peacefully, or at least providing an explanation for your reversion in your edit summary, you simply reverted an old edit from that IP address again without any justification. The only semblance of an explanation provided for your continuous reversions (which in itself is problematic) is for the IP user to "spell correctly," referring to their misspelling of the word "attack" in their edit summary. In essence, your actions were the antithesis of dispute resolution, unrelated to the actual content of the edit (unless it constitutes clear vandalism), and you possess sufficient experience on this site to recognize this. I sincerely hope that you will use this time to re-evaluate your approach to editing and communicating with other users in general, and I urge you to revisit the advice offered by numerous editors on this very talk page. Finally, please refrain from using sockpuppet accounts to circumvent your block, as you have done in the past; this will only result in the extension of your original block. If you wish to challenge this restriction, please contact the administrator who issued the block, providing a justification for why you believe the block to be unwarranted. Anıl Şerifoğlu (talk) 14:23, April 15, 2024 (UTC) ## Notability Hello there, Elijah. I simply wanted to remind you to exercise caution and avoid rushing into article creation. You have received prior warnings regarding this matter, so please ensure that you familiarize yourself with the notability policy. Bonzane10 15:46, November 21, 2024 (UTC) ## Astromechs I removed the lists because it is policy to not have such lists. As for the astromechs, nothing in those toys themselves actually identify them as separate classes, regardless of the similarity to existing Legends models, and obviously-non-canon toys do not a canon article make. Please do not revert my work on other articles because you're upset that I merged some of yours, please. Cade Calrayn 00:11, December 3, 2024 (UTC) - I wasn't upset. I was just curious that's all. Hope there's no hard feelings Elijah Palmer ( talk ) 00:14, December 3, 2024 (UTC) ## Regarding Discord I have lifted the ban; you should now be able to join without any issues. Best regards! Bonzane10 04:41, December 9, 2024 (UTC) ## Warning - Understood. I apologize for the inconvenience. Elijah Palmer (talk) 06:21, December 10, 2024 (UTC) ## Deletion Discussion No. According to the consensus policy, votes must remain open for a period of 2 weeks (336 hours) in most cases. The sole exception occurs when a vote achieves a 20-to-0 result and closes as early as 5 days, or a 9-to-1 ratio result, which can then close as early as 7 days. Forum:TC:Unidentified astromech droid pilot meets neither of these criteria—with 5 delete votes and 10 support votes, it does not satisfy the normal consensus ratios required for a "Keep" result either (ratios chart). For this to close as non-consensus (as it does not meet the required ratio for a flat "Keep" result), it must both be two weeks old and remain unvoted on for a full five days thereafter, as per policy. —spookywillowwtalk 03:15, December 13, 2024 (UTC) ## Wedge Antilles' X-wing Hey Elijah, please ensure that you verify that Wedge actually appears in an X-wing in a particular appearance before listing it. There are several instances on the list you added to Wedge Antilles' X-wing, such as Star Wars (2015) 45, Star Wars (2020) 36, Aftermath, for example, where he is not in an X-wing at all. Thank you! Lewisr (talk) 03:27, December 13, 2024 (UTC) ## Another 3RR Warning ## Re: Hey, I see that you messaged the person who reverted (Hanzo) already, and it's been less than a day since you left him that message. Perhaps give him a decent amount of time to reply? He's also active in the Discord; you could shoot him a message. But, given Hanzo's had less than half a day to reply, admins wouldn't be stepping in at said point; this is is something that would benefit from patience; all editors are volunteers and most, esp if at work or asleep, won't be checking their talk pages. A sidenote being that as noted above, WP:3RR does exist and admins have to abide by it whether we like it or not. Meaning, because your edit was reverted three separate times, by two different users (Hanzo + Ruiz), reverting it back isn't the best course of action and could lead to administrative action if it becomes too much of an edit-war. I suspect the reason people watch this page for changes in particular is because it is a featured article; and changes to any featured articles will always be monitored much more strictly than other pages. I'm sure Hanzo will stop by to explain why when next online; he's one of the site's most experienced Legends status article maintainers. And if not, you can drop it in the #legends channel in the Discord for input, after a reasonable amount of time has passed without a reply (aka, not immediately, patience being a key concept here). —spookywillowwtalk 05:18, December 29, 2024 (UTC) ## Categories Please refrain from modifying the categories while I am actively working on them. Thank you. Cade Calrayn 22:09, December 31, 2024 (UTC) - Understood. Elijah Palmer ( talk ) 22:14, December 31, 2024 (UTC) Elijah. I told you to stop. Just let me do my work, please. Cade Calrayn 22:56, December 31, 2024 (UTC) Fine. Elijah Palmer (talk) 22:57, December 31, 2024 (UTC) ## Deletion Discussion Creation Did I create a Deletion Discussion? First Order Corporal First Order comms 13:51, January 23, 2025 (UTC) - When you added the Deletion Discussion template, the thread was incomplete. You need to create the Deletion Discussion first, then add the template. Elijah Palmer ( talk ) 13:56, January 23, 2025 (UTC) Yeah it was incomplete for a bit until I made the TC. Isn't that how you do it? Add the template and then make the TC? First Order Corporal First Order comms 13:58, January 23, 2025 (UTC) No, you have to make the TC first then add the template. Elijah Palmer (talk) 13:59, January 23, 2025 (UTC) Hmm, on Forum:Trash compactor, it says "simply add TC to the top of the page(s) and follow the template's instructions." Making the TC was in the instructions right? First Order Corporal First Order comms 14:03, January 23, 2025 (UTC) Corporal is correct. Add the template first. Cade Calrayn 14:08, January 23, 2025 (UTC) Oh, I didn't realize, my bad! Elijah Palmer (talk) 14:09, January 23, 2025 (UTC) ## Toys and Naming Elijah, please, stop. I understand your desire to be the one to discover names and create articles, but a toy description from Amazon or Target does not constitute a valid source for a non-conjectural name for a vehicle. Especially when it's clearly not an in-universe name and features obviously unnecessary capitalization. If an administrator (or another user, for that matter) undoes your edit, redoing the same edit when they're not looking is neither courteous nor acceptable behavior. Cade
A message left by Calrayn at 02:43 on February 24th, 2025 (UTC).